Comparison Overview

ArtHouse Design

VS

Studio Impact

ArtHouse Design

2373 Central Park Blvd., Denver, CO, 80238, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

With almost 30 years of experience, ArtHouse Design is an internationally-recognized leader in branding, placemaking and experiential graphic design. We are highly collaborative and work seamlessly leading project teams or as part of a broader effort, working with writers, developers, architects, urban planners and artists. Our team is exceptionally creative, passionate, detail-oriented, hard-working and experienced and we bring a unique level of artfulness to every aspect of our work. We create intentional, eye-catching design solutions that elevate any brand or physical space with strategy, vision and innovation. Our process is in-depth and thoughtful with listening, concept development, design and oversight woven into every phase of a project. Our team of designers, artists, photographers and writers is actively engaged in design conversations at the local and national levels, and is frequently recognized for elevating the design industry in Denver and the Rocky Mountain West. Like many Denverites, we are passionate about the Mile High City and invested in its future. We love working in our hometown and are happy to bring our passion and talents all over the US and world.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Studio Impact

Kieler Bocht 15e, Groningen, NL, 9723 JA
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Studio Impact is een jong bedrijf op het gebied van Grafische vormgeving en webdesign & realisatie gevestigd in Groningen. Bedrijven en particulieren kunnen bij ons terecht voor grafische vormgeving, drukwerk, dtp, webdesign en webdevelopment, maar ook voor illustratie, fotobewerking, hosting en domeinregistratie. Design is onze kernactiviteit, maar door onze ervaring met ICT kunnen klanten bij ons terecht voor het complete pakket. We leveren complete websites op basis van WordPress en webshops op basis van OpenCart. We maken dus niet alleen een mooi plaatje maar zijn ook heer en meester met html en css, en kunnen ook uit de voeten kunnen met php, javascript, jQuery en MySQL. Hoewel we geen programmeurs in dienst hebben duiken we niet weg voor gecompliceerde opdrachten zoals op maat gemaakte webapplicaties. Hiervoor zoeken we de samenwerking met externe programmeurs. Ook hebben we goede banden met internetmarketeers, drukkers, vertalers en tekstschrijvers. Zo kunnen we onze klanten op alle vlakken bedienen.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arthouse-design.jpeg
ArtHouse Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-impact.jpeg
Studio Impact
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ArtHouse Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Studio Impact
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ArtHouse Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio Impact in 2025.

Incident History — ArtHouse Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ArtHouse Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Studio Impact (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio Impact cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arthouse-design.jpeg
ArtHouse Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-impact.jpeg
Studio Impact
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Studio Impact company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ArtHouse Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Studio Impact company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ArtHouse Design company.

In the current year, Studio Impact company and ArtHouse Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Studio Impact company nor ArtHouse Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Studio Impact company nor ArtHouse Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Studio Impact company nor ArtHouse Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ArtHouse Design company nor Studio Impact company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ArtHouse Design nor Studio Impact holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ArtHouse Design company nor Studio Impact company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ArtHouse Design company employs more people globally than Studio Impact company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither ArtHouse Design nor Studio Impact holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ArtHouse Design nor Studio Impact holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ArtHouse Design nor Studio Impact holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ArtHouse Design nor Studio Impact holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ArtHouse Design nor Studio Impact holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ArtHouse Design nor Studio Impact holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X