Comparison Overview

Arthouse advertising photography ltd

VS

Photography by Jeffrey G

Arthouse advertising photography ltd

The Studio Arthouse Ltd Unit 2 Saxon Way, South Cambridgeshire, Herts, SG8 6DN, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-15

We are a company specialising in high end high resolution photography. We work closely with architects, designers, property developers and our other commercial clients. Based at our own fully equipped photographic studio just South of Cambridge we provide studio and location photography, digital image processing, retouching, prop services, styling and models for our clients shoots.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Photography by Jeffrey G

US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Photography from personal to commercial. Specializing in weddings, engagement, portraiture, commercial, real estate, function and events. My portable studio is brought to your home or business. By coming to your house or business, everyone is more comfortable clothing can be changed, children can be cleaned up. Children are also more responsive in their own environment.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arthouse-advertising-photography-ltd.jpeg
Arthouse advertising photography ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Photography by Jeffrey G
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Arthouse advertising photography ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Photography by Jeffrey G
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arthouse advertising photography ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Photography by Jeffrey G in 2025.

Incident History — Arthouse advertising photography ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arthouse advertising photography ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Photography by Jeffrey G (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Photography by Jeffrey G cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arthouse-advertising-photography-ltd.jpeg
Arthouse advertising photography ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Photography by Jeffrey G
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Photography by Jeffrey G company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Arthouse advertising photography ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Photography by Jeffrey G company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Arthouse advertising photography ltd company.

In the current year, Photography by Jeffrey G company and Arthouse advertising photography ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Photography by Jeffrey G company nor Arthouse advertising photography ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Photography by Jeffrey G company nor Arthouse advertising photography ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Photography by Jeffrey G company nor Arthouse advertising photography ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Arthouse advertising photography ltd company nor Photography by Jeffrey G company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Arthouse advertising photography ltd nor Photography by Jeffrey G holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Arthouse advertising photography ltd company nor Photography by Jeffrey G company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Photography by Jeffrey G company employs more people globally than Arthouse advertising photography ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Arthouse advertising photography ltd nor Photography by Jeffrey G holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Arthouse advertising photography ltd nor Photography by Jeffrey G holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Arthouse advertising photography ltd nor Photography by Jeffrey G holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Arthouse advertising photography ltd nor Photography by Jeffrey G holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Arthouse advertising photography ltd nor Photography by Jeffrey G holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Arthouse advertising photography ltd nor Photography by Jeffrey G holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N