Comparison Overview

Artex Label & Graphics Inc

VS

Insty-Prints of Rochester

Artex Label & Graphics Inc

740 Case Karsten Drive, Zeeland, MI, 49464, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.artexlabel.com

What's to say? Well, a lot actually. As one of the leading suppliers of custom labels in the country, Artex has built its business around the needs of our thousands of satisfied (dare we say ecstatic?) customers. From healthcare and food, to building products and educational supplies, Artex Label has grown into an industry leader by putting the needs of our customers first. Regardless of what industry you are in, Artex Label's dedicated team of artists, craftsmen, customer service specialists and sales consultants are waiting to help you make a difference on behalf of your brand!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Insty-Prints of Rochester

2410 North Broadway, Rochester, MN, 55906, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.instyroch.com

INSTY-PRINTS of Rochester Minnesota is your one stop shop for all your printing, signs, banners, and marketing solutions. Whether it is a business presentation, large engineering document, or personal project, Insty-Prints will help you every step of the way. Our professional staff and experienced crew will give your projects a professional, clean, and polished look .We offer a vast array of services from start to finish. It is our focus to make you look good and put your marketing dollars to best work for you. We offer digital printing, printing and publishing, graphic design, business printing, banner printing, and sign printing to name a few of our services.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/artex-label-&-graphics-inc.jpeg
Artex Label & Graphics Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/insty-prints-of-rochester.jpeg
Insty-Prints of Rochester
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Artex Label & Graphics Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Insty-Prints of Rochester
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Artex Label & Graphics Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Insty-Prints of Rochester in 2025.

Incident History — Artex Label & Graphics Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Artex Label & Graphics Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Insty-Prints of Rochester (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Insty-Prints of Rochester cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/artex-label-&-graphics-inc.jpeg
Artex Label & Graphics Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/insty-prints-of-rochester.jpeg
Insty-Prints of Rochester
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Artex Label & Graphics Inc company and Insty-Prints of Rochester company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Insty-Prints of Rochester company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Artex Label & Graphics Inc company.

In the current year, Insty-Prints of Rochester company and Artex Label & Graphics Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Insty-Prints of Rochester company nor Artex Label & Graphics Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Insty-Prints of Rochester company nor Artex Label & Graphics Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Insty-Prints of Rochester company nor Artex Label & Graphics Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Artex Label & Graphics Inc company nor Insty-Prints of Rochester company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Artex Label & Graphics Inc nor Insty-Prints of Rochester holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Artex Label & Graphics Inc company nor Insty-Prints of Rochester company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Artex Label & Graphics Inc company employs more people globally than Insty-Prints of Rochester company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Artex Label & Graphics Inc nor Insty-Prints of Rochester holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Artex Label & Graphics Inc nor Insty-Prints of Rochester holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Artex Label & Graphics Inc nor Insty-Prints of Rochester holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Artex Label & Graphics Inc nor Insty-Prints of Rochester holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Artex Label & Graphics Inc nor Insty-Prints of Rochester holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Artex Label & Graphics Inc nor Insty-Prints of Rochester holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References