Comparison Overview

ARTECO

VS

Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology

ARTECO

Oud-Cromstrijensedijk WZ 110 Klaaswaal, 3286 BV, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

ARTECO is experienced in solving design and construction problems related to mechanical engineering, industry and ship building. This is among others the technical calculations for cranes and lifting supplies, design of bridges, lock gates and (lifting)platforms. In additional ARTECO has practical experience in manufacturing of constructions and machines, this results in a practical vision on the work out of the design and drawings.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology

Last Update:

Electronic motion and control technology includes a wide range of Parker industrial and mobile products and systems designed for easy configuration. Custom solutions range from vehicle electrification to precision motion control systems for manufacturing operations. Industries served include food and beverage, packaging, life sciences, printing and converting, construction machinery, photonics, in-plant automotive, on-vehicle automotive, material handling, electronics manufacturing, aerospace, robotics, industrial machinery, metrology, and many more. Components are available separately or as a complete motion system to make integration simple, fast, and easy. Product manufactured include top brand names like CTC USA, Acroloop, Daedal, Origa, Bayside Motion Group, Trilogy Motion Systems, SSD Drives, Vansco, and IQAN.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arteco.jpeg
ARTECO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/parker-electromechanical-drive-technology.jpeg
Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ARTECO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ARTECO in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology in 2025.

Incident History — ARTECO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ARTECO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arteco.jpeg
ARTECO
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/parker-electromechanical-drive-technology.jpeg
Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: phishing, exploiting vulnerabilities, malware deployment
Motivation: financial gain, cybercrime
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ARTECO company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ARTECO company has not reported any.

In the current year, Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology company has reported more cyber incidents than ARTECO company.

Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while ARTECO company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology company has disclosed at least one data breach, while ARTECO company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology company nor ARTECO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ARTECO company nor Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ARTECO nor Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ARTECO company.

Both ARTECO company and Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither ARTECO nor Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ARTECO nor Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ARTECO nor Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ARTECO nor Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ARTECO nor Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ARTECO nor Parker Electromechanical and Drive Technology holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H