Comparison Overview

Artcraft Photoworks

VS

Digital Photo Graphics

Artcraft Photoworks

520 Albany Ave, Kingston, NY, 12401, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Artcraft Photoworks of Kingston, New York is full service photo lab and custom frame shop. We're known as the place to go in the Hudson Valley for photo, video, framing and custom imaging needs. Our team is group of savvy photo professionals, that specialize in all things photo. We are all committed to the concept that photographs were meant to be shared, and are able to be passed from generation to generation. Artcraft has a reputation for providing consistent, timely and quality service to clients since 1942. Our goal is to make our clients feel comfortable and satisfied with the experience and the quality of the service they receive. At Artcraft, we pride ourselves with offering the proper photographic solutions for our clients challenges. We are dedicated to making our customers experience with us a pleasant one. Artcraft Photoworks allows you to preserve memories by printing pictures in a variety of sizes on many different types of paper. We offer my different types of archiving and printing services. From scanning your old photos, slides, negatives and 8mm reel to reels to fine art reproductions, we handle all the formats of yesteryear as well as all of the modern trends.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Digital Photo Graphics

8077 Florence Ave., Downey, CA, 90240, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Digital Photo Graphics (dpgworks) is committed to inspire ideas and produce original concepts in photography, design, video, and print. We have the capacity to produce a large selection of imaging products for a variety of uses and needs. Our office is conveniently located in Downey, CA just minutes away from FOUR major freeways (5 FWY, 605 FWY, 710 FWY, and 105 FWY) and walking distance from Downtown Downey.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/artcraft-camera-&-digital.jpeg
Artcraft Photoworks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digital-photo-graphics.jpeg
Digital Photo Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Artcraft Photoworks
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Digital Photo Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Artcraft Photoworks in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Digital Photo Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Artcraft Photoworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Artcraft Photoworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Digital Photo Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Digital Photo Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/artcraft-camera-&-digital.jpeg
Artcraft Photoworks
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digital-photo-graphics.jpeg
Digital Photo Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Digital Photo Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Artcraft Photoworks company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Digital Photo Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Artcraft Photoworks company.

In the current year, Digital Photo Graphics company and Artcraft Photoworks company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Digital Photo Graphics company nor Artcraft Photoworks company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Digital Photo Graphics company nor Artcraft Photoworks company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Digital Photo Graphics company nor Artcraft Photoworks company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Artcraft Photoworks company nor Digital Photo Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Artcraft Photoworks nor Digital Photo Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Artcraft Photoworks company nor Digital Photo Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Digital Photo Graphics company employs more people globally than Artcraft Photoworks company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Artcraft Photoworks nor Digital Photo Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Artcraft Photoworks nor Digital Photo Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Artcraft Photoworks nor Digital Photo Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Artcraft Photoworks nor Digital Photo Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Artcraft Photoworks nor Digital Photo Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Artcraft Photoworks nor Digital Photo Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L