Comparison Overview

Art Museum Of Southeast Texas

VS

Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum

Art Museum Of Southeast Texas

500 Main St, Beaumont, Texas 77701, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Art Museum of Southeast Texas'​ purpose is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret the arts with special attention to Texas fine and folk arts of the 19th-21st centuries. Through unique collections, exhibitions, public programs and outreach in the visual arts, AMSET's mission is to provide education, inspiration and creative vision throughout Southeast Texas.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum

705 S. McClelland Street, Santa Maria, CA, 93454, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Discovery Museum is fun for all ages, with “please touch” exhibits and programs that explore ourselves, our valley, our world and beyond. Climb the Mission to Mars rock wall, dig for ancient fossils in the Discovery Tar Pits and flee from pirates on a giant ship…but look out for whales and those pesky seagulls! Saddle up and ride through a history of our valley, make your own family brand, live like a cowboy in the bunkhouse and plant, water and take home your own backyard garden. Stimulate your imagination at the Creation Station and make a life-sized bubble! At the Discovery Museum, the possibilities are endless, so come play and learn at the only children’s museum in Santa Barbara County. Tuesday-Saturday 10-5. Sunday 12-4. Visit www.smvdiscoverymuseum.org and facebook for special Sunday events.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/art-museum-of-southeast-texas.jpeg
Art Museum Of Southeast Texas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santa-maria-valley-discovery-museum.jpeg
Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Art Museum Of Southeast Texas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Art Museum Of Southeast Texas in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Art Museum Of Southeast Texas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Art Museum Of Southeast Texas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/art-museum-of-southeast-texas.jpeg
Art Museum Of Southeast Texas
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santa-maria-valley-discovery-museum.jpeg
Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Art Museum Of Southeast Texas company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Art Museum Of Southeast Texas company.

In the current year, Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum company and Art Museum Of Southeast Texas company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum company nor Art Museum Of Southeast Texas company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum company nor Art Museum Of Southeast Texas company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum company nor Art Museum Of Southeast Texas company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Art Museum Of Southeast Texas company nor Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Art Museum Of Southeast Texas nor Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Art Museum Of Southeast Texas company nor Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Art Museum Of Southeast Texas company employs more people globally than Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Art Museum Of Southeast Texas nor Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Art Museum Of Southeast Texas nor Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Art Museum Of Southeast Texas nor Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Art Museum Of Southeast Texas nor Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Art Museum Of Southeast Texas nor Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Art Museum Of Southeast Texas nor Santa Maria Valley Discovery Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N