Comparison Overview

Ars Electronica

VS

Newcastle Castle

Ars Electronica

Ars-Electronica-Straße 1, Linz, Oberösterreich, AT, 4040
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

We don't deliver the future, we help develop future viability. We work for and with our clients from business and industry, science and education, art and culture, to create experiential spaces and communication formats that address the big questions of the 21st century. With the expertise, creativity and passion of artists, designers, developers, technicians, scientists and activists, we explore how technology can be part of the solution.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 137
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Newcastle Castle

Castle Garth, NE1 1RQ, Tyne and Wear NE1 1RQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Reimagine your event with Newcastle Castle. This Norman Fortress is the perfect place for your one of a kind event - from weddings to walking tours, meeting spaces to medieval taverns, Newcastle Castle has everything for an occasion to remember. Email [email protected] to receive our corporate brochure for more information about everything we offer.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arselectronica.jpeg
Ars Electronica
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newcastle-castle.jpeg
Newcastle Castle
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ars Electronica
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Newcastle Castle
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ars Electronica in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Newcastle Castle in 2025.

Incident History — Ars Electronica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ars Electronica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Newcastle Castle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Newcastle Castle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arselectronica.jpeg
Ars Electronica
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newcastle-castle.jpeg
Newcastle Castle
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ars Electronica company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Newcastle Castle company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Newcastle Castle company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ars Electronica company.

In the current year, Newcastle Castle company and Ars Electronica company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Newcastle Castle company nor Ars Electronica company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Newcastle Castle company nor Ars Electronica company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Newcastle Castle company nor Ars Electronica company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ars Electronica company nor Newcastle Castle company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ars Electronica nor Newcastle Castle holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ars Electronica company nor Newcastle Castle company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ars Electronica company employs more people globally than Newcastle Castle company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Ars Electronica nor Newcastle Castle holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ars Electronica nor Newcastle Castle holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ars Electronica nor Newcastle Castle holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ars Electronica nor Newcastle Castle holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ars Electronica nor Newcastle Castle holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ars Electronica nor Newcastle Castle holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X