Comparison Overview

Arrendamas

VS

J.P. Morgan

Arrendamas

Ontario No. 1107 Int. 4, Colonia Lomas de Guevara Guadalajara, Jalisco 44657, MX
Last Update: 2025-05-01 (UTC)
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.arrendamas.com

En Arrenda+ somos expertos en financiamiento para emprendedores, PYMES y empresas medianas que buscan fuentes alternativas a instituciones financieras tradicionales. Nuestras áreas de especialización son: Arrendamiento puro y Crédito para la compra de cualquier tipo de activo como maquinaria industrial, equipo médico, transporte. De igual manera para el financiamiento de capital de trabajo y proyectos empresariales.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 11-50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

J.P. Morgan

270 Park Avenue, New York, NY, 10017, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
Between 800 and 849
http://www.jpmorgan.com

J.P. Morgan is a leader in financial services, offering solutions to clients in more than 100 countries with one of the most comprehensive global product platforms available. We have been helping our clients to do business and manage their wealth for more than 200 years. Our business has been built upon our core principle of putting our clients'​ interests first. J.P. Morgan is part of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM), a global financial services firm. Social Media Terms and Conditions: https://bit.ly/JPMCSocialTerms © 2017 JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPMorgan Chase is an equal opportunity and affirmative action employer Disability/Veteran.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 75,360
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arrendamas.jpeg
Arrendamas
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j-p-morgan.jpeg
J.P. Morgan
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Arrendamas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
J.P. Morgan
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arrendamas in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J.P. Morgan in 2025.

Incident History — Arrendamas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arrendamas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — J.P. Morgan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J.P. Morgan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arrendamas.jpeg
Arrendamas
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j-p-morgan.jpeg
J.P. Morgan
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Legitimate software and open-source pen-testing tools
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Software Issue
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Software Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

J.P. Morgan company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Arrendamas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

J.P. Morgan company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Arrendamas company has not reported any.

In the current year, J.P. Morgan company has reported more cyber incidents than Arrendamas company.

J.P. Morgan company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Arrendamas company has not reported such incidents publicly.

J.P. Morgan company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Arrendamas company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither J.P. Morgan company nor Arrendamas company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Arrendamas company nor J.P. Morgan company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Arrendamas nor J.P. Morgan holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

J.P. Morgan company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Arrendamas company.

J.P. Morgan company employs more people globally than Arrendamas company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Arrendamas nor J.P. Morgan holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Arrendamas nor J.P. Morgan holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Arrendamas nor J.P. Morgan holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Arrendamas nor J.P. Morgan holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Arrendamas nor J.P. Morgan holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Arrendamas nor J.P. Morgan holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The Bold Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘percentage’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.4.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The ComboServlet in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.2, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.5, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions does not limit the number or size of the files it will combine, which allows remote attackers to create very large responses that lead to a denial of service attack via the URL query string.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and create arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary files on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References