Comparison Overview

Arnold Printed Communications

VS

PULP Printhouse

Arnold Printed Communications

53 Eastman Ave, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17603, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://arnoldprint.com

Founded over fifty years ago, Arnold Printed Communications is now one of the top distributors in the United States. The company began by offering "traditional" handwritten, continuous and unit set business form products. More recently new technologies such as bar coding, laser, label/form combinations, plastic cards, and self-seal products have become an important part of the product line. Forms/Inventory Management Services have been complemented with "Just-In-Time"(JIT) inventory capabilities and our own Warehousing and fulfillment Services. This ensures that your releases are processed and delivered to you without unnecessary delays. Always client-oriented, Arnold continues to offer the latest advances to their clients. Clients can order, review inventory levels and make product releases from our warehouses via online applications or simple e-mail messages to their Account Executive and Customer Service Representatives. The company is committed to maintaining their leadership position into the millennium. Arnold has created an organization that has utilized the knowledge of the past to take them forward to the future. And as in the past, our name will always be synonymous with quality.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

PULP Printhouse

1706 West State Street, Bristol, TN, 37620, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.getpulp.com

PULP is a new breed of marketing company, built from the ground up to work alongside your company’s internal marketing department and with your traditional advertising agency to form a virtual “marketing superteam.” On this team, we carry the ball that strengthens your brand by weaving stories about your products and services. We combine logic and magic to educate and captivate your audience. We tell these stories across multiple channels, including social, to create communities of brand followers and word of mouth evangelists.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arnold-printed-communications.jpeg
Arnold Printed Communications
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pulp-printhouse.jpeg
PULP Printhouse
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Arnold Printed Communications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PULP Printhouse
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arnold Printed Communications in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PULP Printhouse in 2025.

Incident History — Arnold Printed Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arnold Printed Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PULP Printhouse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PULP Printhouse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arnold-printed-communications.jpeg
Arnold Printed Communications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pulp-printhouse.jpeg
PULP Printhouse
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PULP Printhouse company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Arnold Printed Communications company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PULP Printhouse company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Arnold Printed Communications company.

In the current year, PULP Printhouse company and Arnold Printed Communications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PULP Printhouse company nor Arnold Printed Communications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PULP Printhouse company nor Arnold Printed Communications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PULP Printhouse company nor Arnold Printed Communications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Arnold Printed Communications company nor PULP Printhouse company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Arnold Printed Communications nor PULP Printhouse holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Arnold Printed Communications company nor PULP Printhouse company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PULP Printhouse company employs more people globally than Arnold Printed Communications company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Arnold Printed Communications nor PULP Printhouse holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Arnold Printed Communications nor PULP Printhouse holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Arnold Printed Communications nor PULP Printhouse holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Arnold Printed Communications nor PULP Printhouse holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Arnold Printed Communications nor PULP Printhouse holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Arnold Printed Communications nor PULP Printhouse holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References