Comparison Overview

arnold graphic design

VS

Guardian Computer & Design Services

arnold graphic design

PO Box 162, Carthage, TX, 75633, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Arnold Graphic Design was started in 2002 by one girl, with one computer and one client. Almost 12 years later, AGD is plus five and works with over 100 companies in various parts of the United States. Our clients range from small startups to large corporations. Ultimately, their success is our greatest interest. We are quick, competitive, but most importantly, strive to keep up with the current trends in web and print advertising and design. Educating ourselves in the technology it takes to provide our clients with the latest and greatest is a must. We design everything from the smallest printed pieces to customizing the latest craze in social media. We love a challenge and are not afraid of the unknown. No job is too BIG or too small!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Guardian Computer & Design Services

undefined, undefined, undefined, 80021, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Guardian Computer & Design Services is committed to delivering innovative, personalized, and affordable services directly to your home or small business. We are dedicated to being your personal computer guardian that can take care of all your technology needs. We provide design solutions, specializing in website creation and business identities. We offer unique membership benefits unlike any of our competitors. We stand by our services and care about our clients above all else.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arnold-graphic-design.jpeg
arnold graphic design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guardian-computer-&-design-services.jpeg
Guardian Computer & Design Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
arnold graphic design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Guardian Computer & Design Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for arnold graphic design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Guardian Computer & Design Services in 2025.

Incident History — arnold graphic design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

arnold graphic design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Guardian Computer & Design Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Guardian Computer & Design Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arnold-graphic-design.jpeg
arnold graphic design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guardian-computer-&-design-services.jpeg
Guardian Computer & Design Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Guardian Computer & Design Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to arnold graphic design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Guardian Computer & Design Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to arnold graphic design company.

In the current year, Guardian Computer & Design Services company and arnold graphic design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Guardian Computer & Design Services company nor arnold graphic design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Guardian Computer & Design Services company nor arnold graphic design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Guardian Computer & Design Services company nor arnold graphic design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither arnold graphic design company nor Guardian Computer & Design Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither arnold graphic design nor Guardian Computer & Design Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither arnold graphic design company nor Guardian Computer & Design Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Guardian Computer & Design Services company employs more people globally than arnold graphic design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither arnold graphic design nor Guardian Computer & Design Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither arnold graphic design nor Guardian Computer & Design Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither arnold graphic design nor Guardian Computer & Design Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither arnold graphic design nor Guardian Computer & Design Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither arnold graphic design nor Guardian Computer & Design Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither arnold graphic design nor Guardian Computer & Design Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X