Comparison Overview

ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving

VS

Balance GFX

ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving

Santpoortse Dreef 138 Santpoort-Noord, 2071TS, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

In 2008 is Alec Nijssen zijn freelance activiteiten gestart onder de bedrijfsnaam ARN grafisch & multimedia vormgeving. Sindsdien heeft Alec met verschillende bedrijven en ondernemers samengewerkt. Zijn projecten variëren van het ontwikkelen of herontwerpen van websites tot het ontwerpen van logo’s en huisstijlen. Daarnaast specialiseert hij zich in website en zoekmachine optimalisatie.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Balance GFX

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Balance GFX develops visuals and original theme concepts, creating an exciting world for the ultimate casino slot gaming experience. Our team has helped influence visual design trends in the industry. With each release, we actively participate in the evolution of gaming by pushing the boundaries through mastering new techniques, redefining styles and refining the approaches to our work. Our games are visually engaging, innovative and memorable and we are committed to providing the most visually attractive and motivating casino entertainment.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arn.jpeg
ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/balance-gfx.jpeg
Balance GFX
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Balance GFX
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Balance GFX in 2025.

Incident History — ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Balance GFX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Balance GFX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arn.jpeg
ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/balance-gfx.jpeg
Balance GFX
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Balance GFX company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Balance GFX company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving company.

In the current year, Balance GFX company and ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Balance GFX company nor ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Balance GFX company nor ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Balance GFX company nor ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving company nor Balance GFX company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving nor Balance GFX holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving company nor Balance GFX company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving company and Balance GFX company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving nor Balance GFX holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving nor Balance GFX holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving nor Balance GFX holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving nor Balance GFX holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving nor Balance GFX holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ARN grafisch en multimedia vormgeving nor Balance GFX holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X