Comparison Overview

Armor Graphics, Inc.

VS

Grandville Printing

Armor Graphics, Inc.

1102 Ogletown Road, Newark, De, 19711, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.armorgraphicsinc.com

Armor Graphics, Inc. is a women owned Graphic Design and Commercial Printing Company. Our storefront location is located at 1102 Ogletown Road in Newark Delaware. This Graphic Design Center houses our top notch Designers as well as our Cutting Edge Digital Printing Devices. From a Graphic Design for your company's Billboard or Marketing Piece and down to a Sign or Banner for your child's next birthday, it is our privilege to enhance your professional and personal life with Colorful Graphics from Juan Rodriquez and his Design Team. Our Offset Print Production Building is not open to the public, but may be toured upon scheduling of an appointment. National and International Delivery options are available for companies of all sizes. Our Customer Relations Manager, Rodney Jordan, will be happy to accommodate any requests for information or scheduling of a tour of our facilities.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Grandville Printing

4719 Ivanrest Ave. SW, Grandville, MI, 49418, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gpco.com

It's a big world in here. Grandville Printing Company was founded in 1956, so we understand how print has evolved and changed through the years. Today, we are a much different company offering print products for clients who need real solutions, more than just ink on paper. Whether you're a big corporation or small business, in Michigan or Miami, need 10 million pieces or just a single poster – we have you covered. We think printing should be easy for the customer yet still cost-effective. So browse our site, get a quote, shop our on-demand print store, work with us to produce a dynamic one-to-one marketing program, or talk retail shelf-edge printing with the Nexgen team. No matter what project is on your plate, let GPC show you how we're doing more with print, than just printing it.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 156
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/armor-graphics-inc..jpeg
Armor Graphics, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grandville-printing.jpeg
Grandville Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Armor Graphics, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grandville Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Armor Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grandville Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Armor Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Armor Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grandville Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grandville Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/armor-graphics-inc..jpeg
Armor Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grandville-printing.jpeg
Grandville Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Armor Graphics, Inc. company and Grandville Printing company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Grandville Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Armor Graphics, Inc. company.

In the current year, Grandville Printing company and Armor Graphics, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grandville Printing company nor Armor Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Grandville Printing company nor Armor Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Grandville Printing company nor Armor Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Armor Graphics, Inc. company nor Grandville Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Armor Graphics, Inc. nor Grandville Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Armor Graphics, Inc. company nor Grandville Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Grandville Printing company employs more people globally than Armor Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Armor Graphics, Inc. nor Grandville Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Armor Graphics, Inc. nor Grandville Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Armor Graphics, Inc. nor Grandville Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Armor Graphics, Inc. nor Grandville Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Armor Graphics, Inc. nor Grandville Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Armor Graphics, Inc. nor Grandville Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References