Comparison Overview

Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts

VS

The New York Historical

Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts

Little Rock, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

The Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts is home to a renowned art collection, an expansive Art School, and exceptional performing arts experiences. Serving the state of Arkansas and beyond, AMFA is committed to providing enriching cultural experiences for all. Founded in 1960, its mission is to ensure that learning, inspiration and creative expression in the arts flourish throughout Arkansas, for people of all ages and backgrounds.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 94
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The New York Historical

170 Central Park West, New York, NY, 10024, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

New York’s first museum, The New York Historical is a leading cultural institution documenting over 400 years of American history through a peerless collection of art, documents, and artifacts. Our offerings span groundbreaking exhibitions; acclaimed educational programs for teachers and students nationwide; and thought-provoking conversations among leading scholars, journalists, and thinkers about the past, present, and future of the American experiment. The New York Historical is a museum of museums and a collection of collections. We are home to the Patricia D. Klingenstein Library, the Center for Women’s History, the Reiss Family Graduate Institute for Constitutional History, the Dorothy Tapper Goldman Center for Teaching Democracy, the DiMenna Children’s History Museum, and the future American LGBTQ+ Museum. We elevate the perspectives and scholarship that define the United States’ democratic heritage and challenge us all to shape our ongoing history for the better.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 299
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arkansas-museum-of-fine-arts.jpeg
Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-historical-society.jpeg
The New York Historical
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The New York Historical
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The New York Historical in 2025.

Incident History — Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The New York Historical (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The New York Historical cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arkansas-museum-of-fine-arts.jpeg
Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-historical-society.jpeg
The New York Historical
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The New York Historical company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The New York Historical company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company.

In the current year, The New York Historical company and Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The New York Historical company nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The New York Historical company nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The New York Historical company nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company nor The New York Historical company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts nor The New York Historical holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company nor The New York Historical company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The New York Historical company employs more people globally than Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts nor The New York Historical holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts nor The New York Historical holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts nor The New York Historical holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts nor The New York Historical holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts nor The New York Historical holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts nor The New York Historical holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X