Comparison Overview

Arkansas Advocate

VS

Technology.org

Arkansas Advocate

undefined, Little Rock, Arkansas, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Arkansas Advocate intends to show how state government affects the lives of everyday Arkansans so they can make informed decisions about themselves, their families and their communities. We strive to amplify the voices of all Arkansans. We focus especially on the relationship between people, power and policy. As an independent, nonpartisan news organization, Arkansas Advocate will keep an eye on the levers of power and those who manipulate them, and hold public officials accountable regardless of party or ideology. We believe news is a vital community service and ethical journalism a cornerstone of democracy, making us key players in fulfilling Arkansas’ state motto, Regnat Populus: “the people rule.”

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Technology.org

Laisves pr. 125A, Vilnius, LT
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Technology Org was founded in 2012 and provides science and technology news from authoritative sources on daily basis. We are interested in various areas of research and engineering. Our primary topics include artificial intelligence, robotics, brain-computer interfaces, quantum computing, aging research, stem cells, as well as many other similar disciplines of science and technology. In addition to the daily news, we also provide information about technological competitions, events, interesting developments, and novel ideas. Our primary sources of information include world-leading universities, institutes, and other organizations, such as research groups or individual authors or their collaborations. Alongside our regular posts based on the news and press releases acquired from these sources, we also maintain an individual section of original content. All published articles are categorized, archived, and freely accessible to everyone. To this date, more than 100,000 articles have been posted on our website. We post news and articles daily to provide our readers with fresh and interesting information every time they visit our website. We are open to contributors from all around the world, as we are constantly looking for original and the most up-to-date content. Our editorial team reviews all submitted articles, videos, infographics, interviews, opinions, or anything related, and provides answers to such requests whenever possible.

NAICS: 5191311
NAICS Definition: Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arkansas-advocate.jpeg
Arkansas Advocate
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technology-org.jpeg
Technology.org
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Arkansas Advocate
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Technology.org
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Internet News Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arkansas Advocate in 2026.

Incidents vs Internet News Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technology.org in 2026.

Incident History — Arkansas Advocate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arkansas Advocate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Technology.org (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technology.org cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arkansas-advocate.jpeg
Arkansas Advocate
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technology-org.jpeg
Technology.org
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Arkansas Advocate company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Technology.org company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Technology.org company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Arkansas Advocate company.

In the current year, Technology.org company and Arkansas Advocate company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Technology.org company nor Arkansas Advocate company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Technology.org company nor Arkansas Advocate company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Technology.org company nor Arkansas Advocate company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Arkansas Advocate company nor Technology.org company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Arkansas Advocate nor Technology.org holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Arkansas Advocate company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Technology.org company.

Neither Arkansas Advocate nor Technology.org holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Arkansas Advocate nor Technology.org holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Arkansas Advocate nor Technology.org holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Arkansas Advocate nor Technology.org holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Arkansas Advocate nor Technology.org holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Arkansas Advocate nor Technology.org holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.