Comparison Overview

Arizona Justice Project

VS

Crag Law Center

Arizona Justice Project

4001 N 3rd St, Phoenix, Arizona, 85012, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

At the Arizona Justice Project we seek justice for the innocent, the wrongfully imprisoned and those who have suffered manifest injustice under Arizona’s Criminal Justice System. The Justice Project reviews and assists in cases of actual innocence or cases in which a manifest injustice has occurred. To date, the Justice Project has received over 5,000 requests for help, and currently has anywhere between 40 to 50 cases in post-conviction relief proceedings or under the supervision of a review team. Oftentimes, the Justice Project is a last resort for men and women who have been failed by our justice system. Their voices would go unheard and sadly, many innocent people would remain wrongfully behind bars without the hard work of our Justice Project staff and volunteers. Our review teams generally consist of a Justice Project staff person or a volunteer lawyer supervisor paired with law students from the Arizona State University College of Law, Arizona Summit Law School, and the University of Arizona College of Law. In addition, the Justice Project is fortunate to have the help of some of the best investigators in Arizona, who spend countless hours tracking down vital information, witnesses and evidence in our cases.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Crag Law Center

3141 E Burnside St, Portland, Oregon, 97214, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Crag Law Center is an environmental nonprofit based in Portland, Oregon that provides free and low cost legal services to conservation groups, grassroots activists, and Tribes throughout the Pacific Northwest. We are Legal Aid for the Environment. Every dollar you donate helps us deliver over $4 million a year in legal aid to protect our communities, climate, and the wild. Join the fight: https://crag.org/

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arizona-justice-project.jpeg
Arizona Justice Project
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crag-law-center.jpeg
Crag Law Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Arizona Justice Project
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Crag Law Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arizona Justice Project in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crag Law Center in 2025.

Incident History — Arizona Justice Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arizona Justice Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Crag Law Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crag Law Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arizona-justice-project.jpeg
Arizona Justice Project
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crag-law-center.jpeg
Crag Law Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Crag Law Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Arizona Justice Project company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Crag Law Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Arizona Justice Project company.

In the current year, Crag Law Center company and Arizona Justice Project company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Crag Law Center company nor Arizona Justice Project company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Crag Law Center company nor Arizona Justice Project company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Crag Law Center company nor Arizona Justice Project company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Arizona Justice Project company nor Crag Law Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Arizona Justice Project nor Crag Law Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Arizona Justice Project company nor Crag Law Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Crag Law Center company employs more people globally than Arizona Justice Project company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Arizona Justice Project nor Crag Law Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Arizona Justice Project nor Crag Law Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Arizona Justice Project nor Crag Law Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Arizona Justice Project nor Crag Law Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Arizona Justice Project nor Crag Law Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Arizona Justice Project nor Crag Law Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X