Comparison Overview

Aristocrat Interactive

VS

Sam Houston Race Park

Aristocrat Interactive

85 Epping Rd, None, Sydney, New South Wales, AU, 2113
Last Update: 2025-11-27

At Aristocrat Interactive, we’re transforming the world of online gaming, iLottery and entertainment. With five go-to-market segments – Gaming Systems, iLottery, iGaming & Sports, iGaming White-Label, and Content & Aggregation – we are proud to serve the entire online RMG industry in regulated markets. We inspire players each and every day by providing our partners in casinos, sports, and government with world-class content, full-service iLottery capabilities, and a complete suite of back-end managed solutions. With a seamless bridge from land to online, we are proud to be your long-term partner throughout your journey in the interactive era.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 1,413
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sam Houston Race Park

7575 N. Sam Houston Parkway West, Houston, 77064, US
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

Sam Houston Race Park (NASDAQ: PENN) is Houston’s premier horse racing and entertainment facility, located 20 minutes from downtown Houston. The track offers a variety of attractions and experiences, including 16 recently renovated luxury suites, the Pavilion Centre for up to 2,000 guests, an award-winning dining experience at the Winner’s Circle Restaurant or private-members only seating in the Jockey Club. The track hosts live Thoroughbred and Quarter Horse racing from January to June each year, in additional to hundreds of special events including concerts, festivals, charity walks and simulcast wagering from around the world. Sam Houston Race Park is Houston’s Best Bet!

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aristocrat-interactive.jpeg
Aristocrat Interactive
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sam-houston-race-park.jpeg
Sam Houston Race Park
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aristocrat Interactive
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sam Houston Race Park
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aristocrat Interactive in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sam Houston Race Park in 2025.

Incident History — Aristocrat Interactive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aristocrat Interactive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sam Houston Race Park (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sam Houston Race Park cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aristocrat-interactive.jpeg
Aristocrat Interactive
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sam-houston-race-park.jpeg
Sam Houston Race Park
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aristocrat Interactive company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sam Houston Race Park company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sam Houston Race Park company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aristocrat Interactive company.

In the current year, Sam Houston Race Park company and Aristocrat Interactive company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sam Houston Race Park company nor Aristocrat Interactive company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sam Houston Race Park company nor Aristocrat Interactive company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sam Houston Race Park company nor Aristocrat Interactive company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aristocrat Interactive company nor Sam Houston Race Park company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aristocrat Interactive nor Sam Houston Race Park holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aristocrat Interactive company nor Sam Houston Race Park company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Aristocrat Interactive company employs more people globally than Sam Houston Race Park company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Aristocrat Interactive nor Sam Houston Race Park holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aristocrat Interactive nor Sam Houston Race Park holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aristocrat Interactive nor Sam Houston Race Park holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aristocrat Interactive nor Sam Houston Race Park holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aristocrat Interactive nor Sam Houston Race Park holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aristocrat Interactive nor Sam Houston Race Park holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H