Comparison Overview

Argyll Diagnostics

VS

BCG Henderson Institute

Argyll Diagnostics

220 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, California, 92660, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Argyll Diagnostics endeavors to understand the true essence behind the [business and economic] decisions people make every day. To do this we interviewed thousands of healthcare clinicians and formed limited ventures with various biotech firms to study and field test human diagnostic protocols from the physical, emotional & mental perspectives. These included… genetic testing clinical trial for individual propensities for physical addiction to opioids and pain perception (Proove Biosciences); emotional/stress levels connected to physical certain symptoms (AssessMD); key areas of interest & reactive behaviors based upon unmet expectations (Birkman International); the origins of Behavioral Economics (Kahneman, Tversky & Thaler, et al.); we even studied the adolescent mental health factors connected to bullying in US schools (AssessFast). In early 2017, Argyll Diagnostics developed an algorithm to effectively assess susceptibility to Cognitive Blind spots. Argyll Diagnostics is a privately held healthcare think tank of Argyll & Co.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BCG Henderson Institute

200 Pier Four Blvd, Boston, MA, 02110, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The BCG Henderson Institute is the Boston Consulting Group’s strategy think tank, dedicated to exploring and developing valuable new insights from business, technology, and science by embracing the powerful technology of ideas. The Institute engages leaders in provocative discussion and experimentation to expand the boundaries of business theory and practice and to translate innovative ideas from within and beyond business. For more ideas and inspiration, sign up to receive BHI INSIGHTS, our monthly newsletter, and follow us on Twitter: @BCGHenderson

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/argyll-diagnostics.jpeg
Argyll Diagnostics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bcg-henderson-institute.jpeg
BCG Henderson Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Argyll Diagnostics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BCG Henderson Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Argyll Diagnostics in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BCG Henderson Institute in 2025.

Incident History — Argyll Diagnostics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Argyll Diagnostics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BCG Henderson Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BCG Henderson Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/argyll-diagnostics.jpeg
Argyll Diagnostics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bcg-henderson-institute.jpeg
BCG Henderson Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Argyll Diagnostics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BCG Henderson Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BCG Henderson Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Argyll Diagnostics company.

In the current year, BCG Henderson Institute company and Argyll Diagnostics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BCG Henderson Institute company nor Argyll Diagnostics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BCG Henderson Institute company nor Argyll Diagnostics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BCG Henderson Institute company nor Argyll Diagnostics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Argyll Diagnostics company nor BCG Henderson Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Argyll Diagnostics nor BCG Henderson Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BCG Henderson Institute company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Argyll Diagnostics company.

BCG Henderson Institute company employs more people globally than Argyll Diagnostics company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Argyll Diagnostics nor BCG Henderson Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Argyll Diagnostics nor BCG Henderson Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Argyll Diagnostics nor BCG Henderson Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Argyll Diagnostics nor BCG Henderson Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Argyll Diagnostics nor BCG Henderson Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Argyll Diagnostics nor BCG Henderson Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X