Comparison Overview

Arentz Law Group

VS

McDaniel Acord, PLLC

Arentz Law Group

3101 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ, 85012, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Arentz Law Group defends the rights of victims in a broad range of personal injury claims, including auto accidents, dangerous drugs, and defective products lawsuits. Arentz Law Group currently handles cases throughout the United States including Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

McDaniel Acord, PLLC

9343 E. 95th Ct., Tulsa, OK, 74133, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Our attorneys are experienced civil litigators, who have earned reputations for zealous, ethical representation that achieves results. We regularly handle matters in the state and federal courts throughout Oklahoma and western Arkansas, and we have served as coordinating counsel for matters in numerous other jurisdictions across the country. Our track record includes successful outcomes in matters involving contract disputes, commercial matters, business torts, architect and engineer professional liability, personal injury and wrongful death, product liability, toxic torts, labor and employment claims, construction disputes, medical malpractice, nursing home negligence, debt collection, foreclosures, trucking and surface transportation, and family law matters, including adoptions, guardianship, divorce and child custody. Few attorneys are truly competent to handle complex litigation. We are. Our clients came to us to handle these cases due to our ability to achieve results intelligently and efficiently, while managing and tracking potentially massive amounts of information and evidence. Our successes include the defeat of multiple attempted class actions and a number of multi-plaintiff mass tort claims. Although we are confident in litigation settings, our approach is to assist our clients in avoiding litigation whenever feasible. We accomplish this by working closely with our clients to explore the potential for negotiated solutions and alternative processes, both at the outset and throughout the duration of a disputed matter.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arentz-law-group.jpeg
Arentz Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcdaniel-acord-pllc.jpeg
McDaniel Acord, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Arentz Law Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
McDaniel Acord, PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arentz Law Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McDaniel Acord, PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — Arentz Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arentz Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — McDaniel Acord, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McDaniel Acord, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arentz-law-group.jpeg
Arentz Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcdaniel-acord-pllc.jpeg
McDaniel Acord, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Arentz Law Group company and McDaniel Acord, PLLC company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, McDaniel Acord, PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Arentz Law Group company.

In the current year, McDaniel Acord, PLLC company and Arentz Law Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither McDaniel Acord, PLLC company nor Arentz Law Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither McDaniel Acord, PLLC company nor Arentz Law Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither McDaniel Acord, PLLC company nor Arentz Law Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Arentz Law Group company nor McDaniel Acord, PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Arentz Law Group nor McDaniel Acord, PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Arentz Law Group company nor McDaniel Acord, PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McDaniel Acord, PLLC company employs more people globally than Arentz Law Group company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Arentz Law Group nor McDaniel Acord, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Arentz Law Group nor McDaniel Acord, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Arentz Law Group nor McDaniel Acord, PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Arentz Law Group nor McDaniel Acord, PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Arentz Law Group nor McDaniel Acord, PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Arentz Law Group nor McDaniel Acord, PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X