Comparison Overview

area 91

VS

Mooiland

area 91

Rötelbachstraße 91, None, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, DE, 89079
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Die rubinion area 91 ist ein New Work Space, das Bürogebäude der Zukunft. Egal ob Sie einen zeitlich befristeten Arbeitsplatz, eine flexible Arbeitsumgebung oder einen Rückzugsraum suchen, hier finden Sie alles. Wir ermöglichen alle modernen Ansätze zur Gestaltung von Arbeitsplätzen in einem modernen Gebäude mit Passivhausstandard. In der rubinion area 91 finden Sie: • Multi Space Working • Coworking Areas • Event Space • Leisure and Fitness Area

NAICS: 53
NAICS Definition: Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mooiland

Arnoud van Gelderweg 69 , Grave, 5361 CV, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

As a corporation, we house more than 50,000 people in 22,000 homes throughout the Netherlands. We give at home by providing sufficient affordable, good quality and sustainable rental housing. But we like to do more. We like to be a corporation that is recognisable, approachable and accessible to ouw residents.

NAICS: 53
NAICS Definition: Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Employees: 302
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/area-91.jpeg
area 91
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mooiland.jpeg
Mooiland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
area 91
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mooiland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate and Equipment Rental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for area 91 in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate and Equipment Rental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mooiland in 2025.

Incident History — area 91 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

area 91 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mooiland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mooiland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/area-91.jpeg
area 91
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mooiland.jpeg
Mooiland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both area 91 company and Mooiland company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Mooiland company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to area 91 company.

In the current year, Mooiland company and area 91 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mooiland company nor area 91 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mooiland company nor area 91 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mooiland company nor area 91 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither area 91 company nor Mooiland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither area 91 nor Mooiland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither area 91 company nor Mooiland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither area 91 nor Mooiland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither area 91 nor Mooiland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither area 91 nor Mooiland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither area 91 nor Mooiland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither area 91 nor Mooiland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither area 91 nor Mooiland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H