Comparison Overview

Arctic Circle Ltd

VS

CETA Makina

Arctic Circle Ltd

Coldnose Rd, Hereford, Herefordshire, HR2 6JL, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We are the industry leaders of innovative heat transfer solutions. As a privately owned British manufacturer, we pride ourselves in our vision to exceed customer expectations ethically and responsibly. We have established a reputation for innovative solutions and have grown consistently to become the undisputed market leader in innovation. We have won numerous awards covering product innovation, training and development, and corporate citizenship and endeavour to continue to be the market leaders of our industry. We believe we have an obligation to help improve the global issues affecting us all. At Arctic Circle, we focus on innovation so that the products and services we produce can reduce energy consumption and reduce CO2 emissions. We are committed to the training and development of our staff, this includes providing full four-year Engineering Apprenticeship placements and supporting Foundation Degrees. We are a proud team and believe in investing in our staff as these are the people who will have the skills and ideas to continue to develop the business in the future.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CETA Makina

Istanbul, 34396, TR
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

CETA builds factories around the world, provides engineering, procurement, construction, commissioning services, also offering machine maintenance, process audits, and consulting - all the while working hard to improve production quality and increase industrial productivity. As a result of its innovative steps in industrial contracting, CETA has earned the trust of many organizations for which it provides support. CETA manufactures machines for use in factories around the four corners of the globe, combining state of the art technology with creative engineering. CETA provides products and services to power and strengthen key sectors of the economy that are critical for advancement and development. Going strong for more than 30 years!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arcticcircleltd.jpeg
Arctic Circle Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ceta-makina.jpeg
CETA Makina
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Arctic Circle Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CETA Makina
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arctic Circle Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CETA Makina in 2025.

Incident History — Arctic Circle Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arctic Circle Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CETA Makina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CETA Makina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arcticcircleltd.jpeg
Arctic Circle Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ceta-makina.jpeg
CETA Makina
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CETA Makina company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Arctic Circle Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CETA Makina company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Arctic Circle Ltd company.

In the current year, CETA Makina company and Arctic Circle Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CETA Makina company nor Arctic Circle Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CETA Makina company nor Arctic Circle Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CETA Makina company nor Arctic Circle Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Arctic Circle Ltd company nor CETA Makina company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Arctic Circle Ltd nor CETA Makina holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Arctic Circle Ltd company nor CETA Makina company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CETA Makina company employs more people globally than Arctic Circle Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Arctic Circle Ltd nor CETA Makina holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Arctic Circle Ltd nor CETA Makina holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Arctic Circle Ltd nor CETA Makina holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Arctic Circle Ltd nor CETA Makina holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Arctic Circle Ltd nor CETA Makina holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Arctic Circle Ltd nor CETA Makina holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H