Comparison Overview

Longview Europe GmbH (formerly arcplan Information Services GmbH)

VS

Meta

Longview Europe GmbH (formerly arcplan Information Services GmbH)

1265 Drummers Lane, Wayne, PA, 19087, US
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900
http://www.longview.com

Strong

Founded in 1994, Longview provides leading corporate performance management (CPM), tax, and business intelligence (BI) solutions to enterprises across industries worldwide. The company’s flagship product, Longview 7, is a unified, scalable platform that automates the following key processes: strategic planning, budgeting and forecasting, modeling, disclosure management/XBRL reporting, statutory consolidation, management reporting, profitability analytics, tax provision/reporting, task management, transparency or any combination thereof. Together with arcplan 8, the power behind its flexible BI solution, Longview has helped hundreds of Fortune 1000 and FTSE 100 companies create a single-source system to better manage their businesses and significantly improve data integrity, decision-making, and financial transparency. For more information visit www.arcplan.com.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Meta

1 Hacker Way, None, Menlo Park, CA, US, 94025
Last Update: 2025-09-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000
https://www.metacareers.com/

Meta's mission is to build the future of human connection and the technology that makes it possible. Our technologies help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp further empowered billions around the world. Now, Meta is moving beyond 2D screens toward immersive experiences like augmented and virtual reality to help build the next evolution in social technology. To help create a safe and respectful online space, we encourage constructive conversations on this page. Please note the following: • Start with an open mind. Whether you agree or disagree, engage with empathy. • Comments violating our Community Standards will be removed or hidden. Please treat everybody with respect. • Keep it constructive. Use your interactions here to learn about and grow your understanding of others. • Our moderators are here to uphold these guidelines for the benefit of everyone, every day. • If you are seeking support for issues related to your Facebook account, please reference our Help Center (https://www.facebook.com/help) or Help Community (https://www.facebook.com/help/community). For a full listing of our jobs, visit https://www.metacareers.com

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 139,000
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
7
Known data breaches
12
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arcplan.jpeg
Longview Europe GmbH (formerly arcplan Information Services GmbH)
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meta.jpeg
Meta
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Longview Europe GmbH (formerly arcplan Information Services GmbH)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Meta
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Longview Europe GmbH (formerly arcplan Information Services GmbH) in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Meta has 1421.74% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Longview Europe GmbH (formerly arcplan Information Services GmbH) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Longview Europe GmbH (formerly arcplan Information Services GmbH) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Meta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arcplan.jpeg
Longview Europe GmbH (formerly arcplan Information Services GmbH)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meta.jpeg
Meta
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Fake Emails, Fake Websites, Spoofed URLs, AI-Generated Scam Sites
Motivation: Financial Gain, Identity Theft, Data Harvesting for Dark Web Sales
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Poor Document Handling, Insufficient Redaction, Metadata Exposure, AI Scraping of Public Datasets
Motivation: Financial Gain (Credential Theft), Competitive Intelligence, Reputational Damage, Regulatory Exploitation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Fake Facebook Security Alert, User-Executed Command via File Explorer, AI-Generated Image Payloads, PowerShell Script Embedding
Motivation: Data Theft, Credential Harvesting, Financial Gain (Potential Ransomware/Fraud)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Meta company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Longview Europe GmbH (formerly arcplan Information Services GmbH) company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Meta company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Longview Europe GmbH (formerly arcplan Information Services GmbH) company has not reported any.

In the current year, Meta company has reported more cyber incidents than Longview Europe GmbH (formerly arcplan Information Services GmbH) company.

Neither Meta company nor Longview Europe GmbH (formerly arcplan Information Services GmbH) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Meta company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Longview Europe GmbH (formerly arcplan Information Services GmbH) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Meta company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Longview Europe GmbH (formerly arcplan Information Services GmbH) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Meta company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Longview Europe GmbH (formerly arcplan Information Services GmbH) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Meta company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Longview Europe GmbH (formerly arcplan Information Services GmbH) company.

Meta company employs more people globally than Longview Europe GmbH (formerly arcplan Information Services GmbH) company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki Cargo extension allows SQL Injection.This issue affects MediaWiki Cargo extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
References
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki QuizGame extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki QuizGame extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
References
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki PollNY extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki PollNY extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
References
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki WebAuthn extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki WebAuthn extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:L/U:Amber
References
Description

pyquokka is a framework for making data lakes work for time series. In versions 0.3.1 and prior, the FlightServer class directly uses pickle.loads() to deserialize action bodies received from Flight clients without any sanitization or validation in the do_action() method. The vulnerable code is located in pyquokka/flight.py at line 283 where arbitrary data from Flight clients is directly passed to pickle.loads(). When FlightServer is configured to listen on 0.0.0.0, this allows attackers across the entire network to perform arbitrary remote code execution by sending malicious pickled payloads through the set_configs action. Additional vulnerability points exist in the cache_garbage_collect, do_put, and do_get functions where pickle.loads is used to deserialize untrusted remote data.

Published
Date
2025-10-17
Updated
Date
2025-10-17
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References