Comparison Overview

Archive Media Partners

VS

Library System of Lancaster County

Archive Media Partners

US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Archive Media Partners’ mission is to assist archivists and librarians in coping with the pressures associated with the rapidly changing technological environment. We will assist your staff with dedicated training and customized manuals and provide consultation on copyright issues, licensing and revenue generation. Our team employs archivists, information management experts, imaging professionals, librarians, and business researchers from a variety of backgrounds. We also specialize in processing archival collections of photographic and motion materials, both traditional and digital, as well as creative treatments. Archive Media Partners also works with organizations that have been frustrated by the imaging process. We will take time to educate you about your choices and are available to repair imaging projects gone awry. We have no partnership with any software company, so recommendations are made only by the client’s need, not by our ties. You expect to add value with digital collection management. You expect to increase revenue, decrease retrieval time, increase efficiency, and know exactly what your intellectual assets are. Archive Media Partners can achieve this with you.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Library System of Lancaster County

1866 Colonial Village Ln, Lancaster, 17601, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Our mission: Provide resources, services, and expertise in a collaborative manner to and with the Member Libraries in order to effectively serve our communities. Our vision: The Library System of Lancaster County supports Member Libraries to be vibrant community centers where people and communities connect to what they need to achieve their greatest potential. Together with Member Libraries, we foster an environment of collaboration, trust and transparency that propels continual development. Member Libraries choose us as an integral partner in their strategy for success.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 30
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Archive Media Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/library-system-of-lancaster-county.jpeg
Library System of Lancaster County
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Archive Media Partners
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Library System of Lancaster County
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Archive Media Partners in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Library System of Lancaster County in 2025.

Incident History — Archive Media Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Archive Media Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Library System of Lancaster County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Library System of Lancaster County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Archive Media Partners
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/library-system-of-lancaster-county.jpeg
Library System of Lancaster County
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Archive Media Partners company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Library System of Lancaster County company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Library System of Lancaster County company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Archive Media Partners company.

In the current year, Library System of Lancaster County company and Archive Media Partners company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Library System of Lancaster County company nor Archive Media Partners company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Library System of Lancaster County company nor Archive Media Partners company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Library System of Lancaster County company nor Archive Media Partners company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Archive Media Partners company nor Library System of Lancaster County company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Archive Media Partners nor Library System of Lancaster County holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Archive Media Partners company nor Library System of Lancaster County company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Library System of Lancaster County company employs more people globally than Archive Media Partners company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Archive Media Partners nor Library System of Lancaster County holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Archive Media Partners nor Library System of Lancaster County holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Archive Media Partners nor Library System of Lancaster County holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Archive Media Partners nor Library System of Lancaster County holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Archive Media Partners nor Library System of Lancaster County holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Archive Media Partners nor Library System of Lancaster County holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H