Comparison Overview

Architecture 2030

VS

Aspen Institute Sports & Society

Architecture 2030

607 Cerrillos Road, None, Santa Fe, NM, US, 87505
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 700 and 749

Architecture 2030 is a non-profit organization established in response to the climate change crisis by architect Edward Mazria in 2002. Architecture 2030’s mission is to rapidly transform the global built environment from the major contributor of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to a central part of the solution to the climate crisis.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Aspen Institute Sports & Society

Aspen Institute Sports & Society Program, Washington, 20037, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Project Play, the Sports & Society Program's signature initiative, develops, applies and shares knowledge to help build healthy communities through sports. We identify access and quality gaps in sport activities for youth and help organizations to fill them. Project Play connects the silos across the disjointed landscape of youth and school sports and develops systems-level solutions. Newsletter signup: as.pn/ppsubscribe.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/architecture2030.jpeg
Architecture 2030
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspeninstsports.jpeg
Aspen Institute Sports & Society
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Architecture 2030
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aspen Institute Sports & Society
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Architecture 2030 in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aspen Institute Sports & Society in 2025.

Incident History — Architecture 2030 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Architecture 2030 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aspen Institute Sports & Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aspen Institute Sports & Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/architecture2030.jpeg
Architecture 2030
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspeninstsports.jpeg
Aspen Institute Sports & Society
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aspen Institute Sports & Society company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Architecture 2030 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Aspen Institute Sports & Society company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Architecture 2030 company.

In the current year, Aspen Institute Sports & Society company and Architecture 2030 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aspen Institute Sports & Society company nor Architecture 2030 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aspen Institute Sports & Society company nor Architecture 2030 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Aspen Institute Sports & Society company nor Architecture 2030 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Architecture 2030 company nor Aspen Institute Sports & Society company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Architecture 2030 nor Aspen Institute Sports & Society holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Aspen Institute Sports & Society company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Architecture 2030 company.

Neither Architecture 2030 nor Aspen Institute Sports & Society holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Architecture 2030 nor Aspen Institute Sports & Society holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Architecture 2030 nor Aspen Institute Sports & Society holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Architecture 2030 nor Aspen Institute Sports & Society holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Architecture 2030 nor Aspen Institute Sports & Society holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Architecture 2030 nor Aspen Institute Sports & Society holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X