Comparison Overview

Architecture 2030

VS

IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science

Architecture 2030

607 Cerrillos Road, Santa Fe, NM, 87505, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://architecture2030.org

Architecture 2030 is a non-profit organization established in response to the climate change crisis by architect Edward Mazria in 2002. Architecture 2030’s mission is to rapidly transform the global built environment from the major contributor of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to a central part of the solution to the climate crisis.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science

Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.iqviainstitute.org

The IQVIA Institute helps health system leaders, academics, policy makers, payers, and providers all over the world use human data science to address some of the biggest questions our industry faces. From creating more efficient systems and better disease prevention and treatment, to enabling more effective delivery of health services, we provide a new, evidence-based lens on how we can evaluate, enable and advance human health.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 124
Subsidiaries: 31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/architecture-2030.jpeg
Architecture 2030
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iqvia-institute.jpeg
IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Architecture 2030
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Architecture 2030 in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science in 2025.

Incident History — Architecture 2030 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Architecture 2030 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/architecture-2030.jpeg
Architecture 2030
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iqvia-institute.jpeg
IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2020
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Architecture 2030 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Architecture 2030 company has not reported any.

In the current year, IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science company and Architecture 2030 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Architecture 2030 company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science company nor Architecture 2030 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science company nor Architecture 2030 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Architecture 2030 company nor IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Architecture 2030 nor IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Architecture 2030 company.

IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science company employs more people globally than Architecture 2030 company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Architecture 2030 nor IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Architecture 2030 nor IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Architecture 2030 nor IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Architecture 2030 nor IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Architecture 2030 nor IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Architecture 2030 nor IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References