Comparison Overview

Archer Ball Consultancy Ltd

VS

PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd.

Archer Ball Consultancy Ltd

Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Specialist Recruitment agency in the Security Cleared market place and SAP community.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2-10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd.

2-1-1 Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku
Last Update: 2025-06-05 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

PERSOL Holdings (re-branded from Temp Holdings) as Japan's largest temp staffing firm and world's 7th largest HR Agency, does management and planning of Group companies providing a wide range of human resource services such as general worker dispatching, permanent placement, outsourcing, etc. โ€œPERSOLโ€ is a word coined to express our aim to solve (SOLUTION) social problems through the growth of people (PERSON). โ€œPERSOLโ€ expresses our aspiration to support the growth of working people and create a bright future.

NAICS: 5613
NAICS Definition: Employment Services
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/archer-ball-consultancy-ltd.jpeg
Archer Ball Consultancy Ltd
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/persol-holdings.jpeg
PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd.
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Archer Ball Consultancy Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Archer Ball Consultancy Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Archer Ball Consultancy Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Archer Ball Consultancy Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/archer-ball-consultancy-ltd.jpeg
Archer Ball Consultancy Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/persol-holdings.jpeg
PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Archer Ball Consultancy Ltd company and PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Archer Ball Consultancy Ltd company.

In the current year, PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company and Archer Ball Consultancy Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company nor Archer Ball Consultancy Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company nor Archer Ball Consultancy Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company nor Archer Ball Consultancy Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Archer Ball Consultancy Ltd company nor PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Archer Ball Consultancy Ltd company nor PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Archer Ball Consultancy Ltd company nor PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.