Comparison Overview

Arcadia Publishing

VS

The New Yorker

Arcadia Publishing

420 Wando Park Blvd, None, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, US, 29464
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.arcadiapublishing.com

As the nation’s leading publisher of books of local interest, Arcadia’s mission is to connect people with their past, their communities and one another. Arcadia is home to the iconic sepia-jacketed Images of America series featuring hyper-local histories of countless hometowns across all fifty states, as well as such series as American Palate, covering local food, beer and wine, and Haunted America, retelling famous hauntings, one city and town at a time. Arcadia has a catalog of more than 17,000 local titles and publishes 500 new local books each year. Using its proprietary Store Match system, Arcadia can create a highly customized hyper-local book assortment for any storefront in the nation.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 228
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

The New Yorker

1 World Trade Center, New York, NY, 10007, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.newyorker.com/

The New Yorker is a national weekly magazine that offers a signature mix of reporting and commentary on politics, foreign affairs, business, technology, popular culture, and the arts, along with humor, fiction, poetry, and cartoons. Founded in 1925, The New Yorker publishes the best writers of its time and has received more National Magazine Awards than any other magazine, for its groundbreaking reporting, authoritative analysis, and creative inspiration. The New Yorker takes readers beyond the weekly print magazine with the web, mobile, tablet, social media, and signature events. The New Yorker is at once a classic and at the leading edge.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1,369
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arcadia-publishing.jpeg
Arcadia Publishing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-new-yorker.jpeg
The New Yorker
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Arcadia Publishing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The New Yorker
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arcadia Publishing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The New Yorker in 2025.

Incident History — Arcadia Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arcadia Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The New Yorker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The New Yorker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arcadia-publishing.jpeg
Arcadia Publishing
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-new-yorker.jpeg
The New Yorker
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The New Yorker company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Arcadia Publishing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Arcadia Publishing company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The New Yorker company has not reported any.

In the current year, The New Yorker company and Arcadia Publishing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The New Yorker company nor Arcadia Publishing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Arcadia Publishing company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other The New Yorker company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The New Yorker company nor Arcadia Publishing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Arcadia Publishing company nor The New Yorker company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Arcadia Publishing nor The New Yorker holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Arcadia Publishing company nor The New Yorker company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The New Yorker company employs more people globally than Arcadia Publishing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Arcadia Publishing nor The New Yorker holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Arcadia Publishing nor The New Yorker holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Arcadia Publishing nor The New Yorker holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Arcadia Publishing nor The New Yorker holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Arcadia Publishing nor The New Yorker holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Arcadia Publishing nor The New Yorker holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References