Comparison Overview

Arca Continental

VS

Grupo Bimbo

Arca Continental

Av. San Jerónimo 813 Pte, Monterrey, 64640, MX
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849

Arca Continental produces, distributes and sells non-alcoholic beverages under The Coca-Cola Company brand, as well as snacks under the brands of Bokados in Mexico, Inalecsa in Ecuador and Wise in the US. With an outstanding history spanning more than 98 years, Arca Continental is the second-largest Coca-Cola botter in Latin America and one of the largest in the world. Within its Coca-Cola franchise territory, the company servers over 119 million consumers in northern and western Mexico, Ecuador, Peru, northern Argentina and southwestern region of the U.S. The Company´s shares trade on the Mexican Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol "AC"​. For more information on Arca Continental, please visit www.arcacontal.com

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 15,509
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Grupo Bimbo

MX
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Grupo Bimbo es la empresa líder en panificación y un jugador relevante en snacks. Hornea +9,000 productos, distribuyéndolos a través de +3.5 millones de puntos de venta con +58,000 rutas. Grupo Bimbo tiene +149,000 colaboradores, +1,500 centros de ventas estratégicamente localizados en 35 países de América, Europa, Asia y África. 223 panaderías y plantas, distribuye, comercializa y elabora una variedad de productos, entre los que destacan el pan de caja, bollería, pan dulce, pastelitos, galletas, pan tostado, English muffins, bagels, tortillas y flatbread y botanas saladas, entre otros. Grupo Bimbo tiene +100 marcas, algunas de ellas son Bimbo, Marinela, Barcel, Milpa Real, Tía Rosa, Thomas, Takis, Sara Lee, Little Bites, Artesano, Saníssimo, Pullman, Ideal, Harvest Gold, The Rustik Bakery, Dempsters, POM, Supán, entre otros. Sus acciones cotizan en la Bolsa Mexicana de Valores (BMV) bajo la clave de pizarra BIMBO y en el mercado extrabursátil de Estados Unidos a través de un programa de ADR Nivel 1, bajo la clave de pizarra BMBOY.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 44,957
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arca-continental.jpeg
Arca Continental
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupobimbo.jpeg
Grupo Bimbo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Arca Continental
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grupo Bimbo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arca Continental in 2026.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Bimbo in 2026.

Incident History — Arca Continental (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arca Continental cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grupo Bimbo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Bimbo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arca-continental.jpeg
Arca Continental
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupobimbo.jpeg
Grupo Bimbo
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach (Hacking)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Arca Continental company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Grupo Bimbo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Grupo Bimbo company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Arca Continental company has not reported any.

In the current year, Grupo Bimbo company and Arca Continental company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grupo Bimbo company nor Arca Continental company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Grupo Bimbo company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Arca Continental company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Grupo Bimbo company nor Arca Continental company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Arca Continental company nor Grupo Bimbo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Arca Continental nor Grupo Bimbo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Grupo Bimbo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Arca Continental company.

Grupo Bimbo company employs more people globally than Arca Continental company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Services.

Neither Arca Continental nor Grupo Bimbo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Arca Continental nor Grupo Bimbo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Arca Continental nor Grupo Bimbo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Arca Continental nor Grupo Bimbo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Arca Continental nor Grupo Bimbo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Arca Continental nor Grupo Bimbo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N