Comparison Overview

Arby's

VS

Darden

Arby's

3 Glenlake Pkwy NE, Atlanta, Georgia, US, 30328
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.arbys.com

Arby’s, founded in 1964, is the second-largest sandwich restaurant brand in the world with more than 3,400 restaurants in seven countries. Arby’s is part of the Inspire Brands family of restaurants. For more information, visit Arbys.com and InspireBrands.com With the current growth and momentum of the brand, Arby’s is actively seeking new franchisees. To learn more about available markets and requirements, visit ArbysFranchising.com

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 27,492
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Darden

1000 Darden Center Drive, Orlando, 32837, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.darden.com

Darden’s family of restaurants features some of the most recognizable and successful brands in full-service dining — Olive Garden, LongHorn Steakhouse, Yard House, Ruth's Chris Steak House, Cheddar’s Scratch Kitchen, The Capital Grille, Chuy's, Seasons 52, Eddie V's and Bahama Breeze. We own and operate more than 2,100 restaurants and are proud to employ 195,000 team members. Together, we create memorable experiences for 420 million guests annually in hundreds of communities across North America.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 78,016
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arby's.jpeg
Arby's
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/darden.jpeg
Darden
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Arby's
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Darden
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arby's in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Darden in 2025.

Incident History — Arby's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arby's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Darden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Darden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arby's.jpeg
Arby's
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Point-of-Sale Systems
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2014
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/darden.jpeg
Darden
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Darden company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Arby's company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Arby's company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Darden company.

In the current year, Darden company and Arby's company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Darden company nor Arby's company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Darden company and Arby's company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Arby's company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Darden company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Arby's company nor Darden company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Arby's nor Darden holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Darden company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Arby's company.

Darden company employs more people globally than Arby's company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Neither Arby's nor Darden holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Arby's nor Darden holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Arby's nor Darden holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Arby's nor Darden holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Arby's nor Darden holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Arby's nor Darden holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References