Comparison Overview

Land Niedersachsen

VS

State of Indiana

Land Niedersachsen

Hannover, 30159, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Der Arbeitgeber Niedersachsen vereint über 2000 Dienststellen mit einem gemeinsamen Ziel: Wir gestalten das Leben in Niedersachsen verantwortungsvoll und zukunftsorientiert. Als der größte Arbeitgeber im Land Niedersachsen bieten wir sichere Arbeitsplätze, sinnstiftende Aufgaben und vielfältige Einsatzbereiche - von Verwaltung über Umwelt, Handwerk, Bildung oder IT bis hin zur Polizei. Wir suchen Menschen mit Engagement und dem Wunsch das Land Niedersachsen mitzugestalten. Ob Berufseinstieg, Quereinstieg oder Laufbahnentwicklung - bei uns findest du deine Perspektive. Vielfalt, Vereinbarkeit und Verlässlichkeit stehen bei uns an erster Stelle. Folge uns, um mehr über aktuelle Stellenangebote, Karrierewege und echte Einblicke in den niedersächsischen Landesdienst zu erfahren. Impressum: https://karriere.niedersachsen.de/impressum.html Datenschutz: https://karriere.niedersachsen.de/datenschutz.html

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 21,421
Subsidiaries: 37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

State of Indiana

200 W. Washington St., None, Indianapolis, IN, US, 46204
Last Update: 2025-12-01

State government is more than senators, representatives, and elected officials. We build highways, provide drivers licenses, protect our children and vulnerable populations, create jobs, connect Hoosiers to job opportunities, maintain state parks, train law enforcement officers, and we run museums and hospitals. We also provide unemployment insurance, disability, and workers compensation, among countless other services. We're 30,000 strong and still have more work to do. Find out where you fit with us at WorkForIndiana.IN.gov.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 14,239
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arbeitgeber-niedersachsen.jpeg
Land Niedersachsen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-indiana.jpeg
State of Indiana
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Land Niedersachsen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
State of Indiana
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Land Niedersachsen in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Indiana in 2025.

Incident History — Land Niedersachsen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Land Niedersachsen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — State of Indiana (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Indiana cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arbeitgeber-niedersachsen.jpeg
Land Niedersachsen
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-indiana.jpeg
State of Indiana
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2019
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

State of Indiana company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Land Niedersachsen company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

State of Indiana company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Land Niedersachsen company has not reported any.

In the current year, State of Indiana company and Land Niedersachsen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither State of Indiana company nor Land Niedersachsen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

State of Indiana company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Land Niedersachsen company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither State of Indiana company nor Land Niedersachsen company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Land Niedersachsen company nor State of Indiana company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Land Niedersachsen nor State of Indiana holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Land Niedersachsen company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to State of Indiana company.

Land Niedersachsen company employs more people globally than State of Indiana company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Land Niedersachsen nor State of Indiana holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Land Niedersachsen nor State of Indiana holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Land Niedersachsen nor State of Indiana holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Land Niedersachsen nor State of Indiana holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Land Niedersachsen nor State of Indiana holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Land Niedersachsen nor State of Indiana holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X