Comparison Overview

Arapahoe Libraries

VS

LA County Library

Arapahoe Libraries

5430 South Biscay Circle, Centennial, CO, 80015, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22

The Arapahoe Library District was established in April 1966 to provide public library service to all residents of Arapahoe County, except those living in the cities of Littleton, Englewood and Aurora. Residents of these cities are served by libraries established prior to 1966 that are funded and maintained by their respective city governments. All Arapahoe County residents, however, are free to use any of the libraries in the county. Our branches are: Castlewood Library Jeanne Davies Library Eloise May Library Ann E. Kelver Library Koelbel Library Mobile Library Services Sheridan Library Smoky Hill Library Southglenn Library You can also find us on Facebook, Twitter, and Goodreads.com.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 294
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LA County Library

7400 Imperial Highway, Downey, California, 90242-3456, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1912, LA County Library is one of the largest and most innovative library systems in the US. It offers free public resources including books, music, multimedia materials, computer and internet access, and educational and recreational services to 3.4 million residents across 3,000 square miles in Los Angeles County through its 85 libraries and mobile fleet of 18 vehicles, including 3 bookmobiles, 10 MākMō maker mobiles, and 5 Reading Machines. LA County Library is dedicated to reducing barriers and increasing access to and equity of public services for all. To learn more, visit LACountyLibrary.org and follow @LACountyLibrary on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 338
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arapahoe-library-district.jpeg
Arapahoe Libraries
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lacountylibrary.jpeg
LA County Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Arapahoe Libraries
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LA County Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arapahoe Libraries in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LA County Library in 2025.

Incident History — Arapahoe Libraries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arapahoe Libraries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LA County Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LA County Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arapahoe-library-district.jpeg
Arapahoe Libraries
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lacountylibrary.jpeg
LA County Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Arapahoe Libraries company and LA County Library company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, LA County Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Arapahoe Libraries company.

In the current year, LA County Library company and Arapahoe Libraries company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LA County Library company nor Arapahoe Libraries company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LA County Library company nor Arapahoe Libraries company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LA County Library company nor Arapahoe Libraries company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Arapahoe Libraries company nor LA County Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Arapahoe Libraries nor LA County Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Arapahoe Libraries company nor LA County Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LA County Library company employs more people globally than Arapahoe Libraries company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Arapahoe Libraries nor LA County Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Arapahoe Libraries nor LA County Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Arapahoe Libraries nor LA County Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Arapahoe Libraries nor LA County Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Arapahoe Libraries nor LA County Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Arapahoe Libraries nor LA County Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H