Comparison Overview

Araki Studio

VS

THINK Graphic Design

Araki Studio

91405, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Concept, design, layout and production for logos, stationery, brochures, packaging, displays, TV titles, posters, T-shirts, ads, newsletters and signage, specializing in print. Responsibilities have also included staff, photography and printing supervision, estimating and client interaction. Team player and self-starter with a penchant for problem-solving. Experienced in automotive, education, entertainment, finance, food, healthcare, high tech, package goods.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

THINK Graphic Design

Last Update: 2025-12-02

You need to communicate clearly with your customers, and that's where THINK Graphic Design can help – with creative, clear and compelling visual communication. THINK Graphic Design was founded by Rick Schuster in 2006. From concise, easy-to-use information graphics to creative, compelling illustration and design, THINK Graphic Design has helped many businesses and organizations improve their image and communications. I believe that good graphic design is a process of thinking, analyzing, and communicating. My design process is anchored in strong problem-solving skills, which result in creative, clear and compelling solutions. Partial Client List: San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) – San Bernardino, CA WestCAT – Western Contra Costa County (Pinole), CA Marin Transit – Marin County, CA RTS – Rochester, NY Calaveras Connect – San Andreas, CA San Joaquin Regional Transportation District (SJRTD) – Stockton, CA Bluegrass RIDE - Georgetown, KY City of Albany Transit – Albany, GA Victor Valley Transit Authority (VVTA) – Hesperia, CA Basin Transit – Joshua Tree, CA Plymouth Metrolink – Plymouth, MN Beloit Transit System – Beloit, WI Minnesota Valley Transit Authority – Burnsville, MN Maple Grove Transit – Maple Grove, MN Project for Pride in Living – Minneapolis, MN Washington County Community Development Agency – Woodbury, MN Community Housing Development Corporation – Minneapolis, MN Metro Transit – Minneapolis, MN City of Commerce Public Transit – Commerce, CA Mountain Transit – Big Bear, CA Connect Transit – Bloomington-Normal, IL La Crosse MTU Transit – La Crosse, WI Waukesha Metro – Waukesha, WI NW Connector – NW Oregon Tahoe Transportation District – Lake Tahoe, NV Wisconsin Coach Lines / Coach USA –Waukesha, WI Show more Show less

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Araki Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/think-graphic-design.jpeg
THINK Graphic Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Araki Studio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
THINK Graphic Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Araki Studio in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for THINK Graphic Design in 2025.

Incident History — Araki Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Araki Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — THINK Graphic Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

THINK Graphic Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Araki Studio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/think-graphic-design.jpeg
THINK Graphic Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Araki Studio company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to THINK Graphic Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, THINK Graphic Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Araki Studio company.

In the current year, THINK Graphic Design company and Araki Studio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither THINK Graphic Design company nor Araki Studio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither THINK Graphic Design company nor Araki Studio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither THINK Graphic Design company nor Araki Studio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Araki Studio company nor THINK Graphic Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Araki Studio nor THINK Graphic Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Araki Studio company nor THINK Graphic Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Araki Studio company employs more people globally than THINK Graphic Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Araki Studio nor THINK Graphic Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Araki Studio nor THINK Graphic Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Araki Studio nor THINK Graphic Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Araki Studio nor THINK Graphic Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Araki Studio nor THINK Graphic Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Araki Studio nor THINK Graphic Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X