Comparison Overview

Applied Automation

VS

Ginolis

Applied Automation

1 Applied Plaza, Cleveland, Ohio, 44115, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Applied Automation is a Trusted Partner to our customers focusing on Robotics, Vision, Motion Controls, and IIoT technologies. We are helping customers achieve real results in Industry 4.0, improving production, quality, and unlocking the potential of automation. We have local partnership and national support for our customers. Companies including @OlympusControls @ACS @GibsonEngineering @RRFloody and Automation Inc. have combined to provide local and regional support but together coverage for companies with multiple facilities across the Americas.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ginolis

Automaatiotie 1, Oulunsalo, undefined, FI-90460, FI
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Ginolis specializes in precision robotics in assembly automation, high precision liquid handling and quality inspection solutions for the global medical device and diagnostics industries as well as other robot applications. Ginolis aims to be one of the leading global systems suppliers in the diagnostics industry to enable the shift to automated production. The company’s liquid handling and desktop automation solutions are characterized by their high quality, precision and modularity. Ginolis is privileged to work in co-operation with many of the world’s leading diagnostic companies.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-industrial-automation.jpeg
Applied Automation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ginolis-ltd.jpeg
Ginolis
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Applied Automation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ginolis
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applied Automation in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ginolis in 2025.

Incident History — Applied Automation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applied Automation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ginolis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ginolis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-industrial-automation.jpeg
Applied Automation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ginolis-ltd.jpeg
Ginolis
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Applied Automation company and Ginolis company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Ginolis company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Applied Automation company.

In the current year, Ginolis company and Applied Automation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ginolis company nor Applied Automation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ginolis company nor Applied Automation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ginolis company nor Applied Automation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Applied Automation company nor Ginolis company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Applied Automation nor Ginolis holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Applied Automation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ginolis company.

Ginolis company employs more people globally than Applied Automation company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Applied Automation nor Ginolis holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Applied Automation nor Ginolis holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Applied Automation nor Ginolis holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Applied Automation nor Ginolis holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Applied Automation nor Ginolis holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Applied Automation nor Ginolis holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H