Comparison Overview

Applied Image

VS

JT Displays

Applied Image

800 Business Park Dr, Freehold, New Jersey, 07728, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Applied Image is a leader and innovator in the production and installation of large format, architectural and environmental graphics. With a state of the art manufacturing facility, we produce a wide range of product, from the small and simple to the large and complex, in terms of materials, design intent, and processes. From design execution to imaging, fabrication and installation, we consistently exceed the expectations of the country’s most demanding corporate, exhibit and retail designers and architects.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

JT Displays

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

We are JT Displays, a long-standing sign company based in Dunstable, Bedfordshire, unveiled to the world in 1975 as a small family business with a vision for high-quality signs provided with a friendly, approachable, great customer service. We now supply and install all types of signage to all types of businesses all over Herts, Beds & Bucks but we still hold fast to our founding values as they have shaped us and continue to mould us as a company, Our success is built on our service ethic and our attention to quality & detail.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-image-inc-.jpeg
Applied Image
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jt-displays.jpeg
JT Displays
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Applied Image
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
JT Displays
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applied Image in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JT Displays in 2025.

Incident History — Applied Image (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applied Image cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — JT Displays (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JT Displays cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-image-inc-.jpeg
Applied Image
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jt-displays.jpeg
JT Displays
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

JT Displays company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Applied Image company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, JT Displays company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Applied Image company.

In the current year, JT Displays company and Applied Image company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither JT Displays company nor Applied Image company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither JT Displays company nor Applied Image company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither JT Displays company nor Applied Image company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Applied Image company nor JT Displays company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Applied Image nor JT Displays holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Applied Image company nor JT Displays company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Applied Image company employs more people globally than JT Displays company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Applied Image nor JT Displays holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Applied Image nor JT Displays holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Applied Image nor JT Displays holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Applied Image nor JT Displays holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Applied Image nor JT Displays holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Applied Image nor JT Displays holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N