Comparison Overview

Applied Control Technology

VS

Georgia Powder Coating Inc

Applied Control Technology

12400 Coit Road, Dallas, TX, 75251, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Applied Control Technology is a full service engineering services company specializing in Industrial Automation. ACT offers a complete suite of industrial engineering and technical services – electrical and mechanical engineering and installation services, including a 508 panel shop, in house steel fabrication capabilities, and instrument tech services. ACT’s specialty is performing full scope turnkey work – from scope development to start up and commissioning. ACT is also a Rockwell Automation registered Solution Provider. Corporate Headquarters are located in Dallas, TX, with branch offices in Texarkana, TX, Shreveport, LA, and Houston, TX. ACT has industrial experience in all types of manufacturing, with process expertise in the Oil and Gas, Mining and Aggregates, Pulp and Paper, and Power Generation verticals. Applied Control Technology is a subsidiary of Cymi/Masa, a division of the Spanish-owned construction company, Grupo ACS.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Georgia Powder Coating Inc

100 Zander Dr, Gainesville, 30504, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

At Georgia Powder Coating we know that you want to have a product that you are proud of. In order to do that you need a powder coating vendor that you can rely on. The problem is the process often drags to a halt because of poor quality, or missed deadlines leaving you feeling stressed and out of control. We believe life has enough uncertainties, your powder coating partner should not be one of them. We know how frustrating it is to be stuck waiting on an unreliable vendor, which is why we worked hard to earn the #1 spot in the North American Top Shops report. Our proven process is fast, easy and reliable. Here’s how it works. It starts with a quick quote that you can receive in less than 24 hours. We make it easy. We can give you a call or you can give us your information online. After that, we handle all the details. We create a job specification customized to your needs and make sure your final product is one you can be proud of. Finally, you receive your work Done Right, On Time, Every Time and say goodbye to the stress of poor quality and missed deadlines.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-control-technology.jpeg
Applied Control Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgia-powder-coating-inc.jpeg
Georgia Powder Coating Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Applied Control Technology
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Georgia Powder Coating Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applied Control Technology in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Georgia Powder Coating Inc in 2025.

Incident History — Applied Control Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applied Control Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Georgia Powder Coating Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Georgia Powder Coating Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-control-technology.jpeg
Applied Control Technology
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgia-powder-coating-inc.jpeg
Georgia Powder Coating Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Applied Control Technology company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Georgia Powder Coating Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Georgia Powder Coating Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Applied Control Technology company.

In the current year, Georgia Powder Coating Inc company and Applied Control Technology company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Georgia Powder Coating Inc company nor Applied Control Technology company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Georgia Powder Coating Inc company nor Applied Control Technology company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Georgia Powder Coating Inc company nor Applied Control Technology company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Applied Control Technology company nor Georgia Powder Coating Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Applied Control Technology nor Georgia Powder Coating Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Applied Control Technology company nor Georgia Powder Coating Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Applied Control Technology company employs more people globally than Georgia Powder Coating Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Applied Control Technology nor Georgia Powder Coating Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Applied Control Technology nor Georgia Powder Coating Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Applied Control Technology nor Georgia Powder Coating Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Applied Control Technology nor Georgia Powder Coating Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Applied Control Technology nor Georgia Powder Coating Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Applied Control Technology nor Georgia Powder Coating Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H