Comparison Overview

Applied Control Concepts

VS

National Filters, Inc.

Applied Control Concepts

207 Hulco Drive, Scott, LA, US, 70583
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Our focus is delivering high quality, high spec control system to industry. We specialize in Combustion, Compression and Power Generation systems and are very customer oriented. We involve our customers through the engineering, design and assembly phases of their project and always welcome shop inspections. All system include Factory Acceptance Testing by the customer or inspector at no charge. We can offer Turn-Key projects because we can control all phases in-house. Engineering, design, drafting and panel assembly are all conducted in one location with a project manager assigned to your project from bid to startup.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

National Filters, Inc.

360 Industrial Parkway, Harbor Beach, Michigan, 48441, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

National Filters, Inc. is an industrial filtration manufacturer located in Harbor Beach, Michigan. At NFI we specialize in the production of hydraulic filter elements to replace all of the popular brands. National Filters product range also includes lubrication oil filters, fuel filters, diesel fuel filters, diesel air filters, dust collection filters, air filters and pool & spa filters. The NFI engineering team can also custom design filtration products based on your requirements.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-control-concepts.jpeg
Applied Control Concepts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-filters-inc-.jpeg
National Filters, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Applied Control Concepts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Filters, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applied Control Concepts in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Filters, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Applied Control Concepts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applied Control Concepts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Filters, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Filters, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-control-concepts.jpeg
Applied Control Concepts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-filters-inc-.jpeg
National Filters, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Applied Control Concepts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Filters, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Filters, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Applied Control Concepts company.

In the current year, National Filters, Inc. company and Applied Control Concepts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Filters, Inc. company nor Applied Control Concepts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Filters, Inc. company nor Applied Control Concepts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Filters, Inc. company nor Applied Control Concepts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Applied Control Concepts company nor National Filters, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Applied Control Concepts nor National Filters, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Applied Control Concepts company nor National Filters, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Filters, Inc. company employs more people globally than Applied Control Concepts company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Applied Control Concepts nor National Filters, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Applied Control Concepts nor National Filters, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Applied Control Concepts nor National Filters, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Applied Control Concepts nor National Filters, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Applied Control Concepts nor National Filters, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Applied Control Concepts nor National Filters, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H