Comparison Overview

Applied Control Concepts

VS

Bachmann electronic GmbH

Applied Control Concepts

207 Hulco Drive, Scott, LA, US, 70583
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Our focus is delivering high quality, high spec control system to industry. We specialize in Combustion, Compression and Power Generation systems and are very customer oriented. We involve our customers through the engineering, design and assembly phases of their project and always welcome shop inspections. All system include Factory Acceptance Testing by the customer or inspector at no charge. We can offer Turn-Key projects because we can control all phases in-house. Engineering, design, drafting and panel assembly are all conducted in one location with a project manager assigned to your project from bid to startup.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bachmann electronic GmbH

Kreuzäckerweg 33, Feldkirch, Vorarlberg, 6800, AT
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Automation, Grid Measurement and Protection, Visualization and Condition Monitoring for plants and machines: this is the core competence and the future of the Bachmann world. Headquartered in Feldkirch, Austria, we are an international and rapidly expan-ding organization with over 500 employees worldwide. We have been developing unique automation and system solutions for our customers on a global scale for over 50 years. When it comes to automation in the energy, industry and maritime sectors, Bachmann is truly an expert. We excel at unique, tailor-made system and solutions, perfectly adapted for the operating environment.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 254
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-control-concepts.jpeg
Applied Control Concepts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bachmann-electronic-gmbh.jpeg
Bachmann electronic GmbH
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Applied Control Concepts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bachmann electronic GmbH
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applied Control Concepts in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bachmann electronic GmbH in 2025.

Incident History — Applied Control Concepts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applied Control Concepts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bachmann electronic GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bachmann electronic GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-control-concepts.jpeg
Applied Control Concepts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bachmann-electronic-gmbh.jpeg
Bachmann electronic GmbH
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bachmann electronic GmbH company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Applied Control Concepts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bachmann electronic GmbH company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Applied Control Concepts company.

In the current year, Bachmann electronic GmbH company and Applied Control Concepts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bachmann electronic GmbH company nor Applied Control Concepts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bachmann electronic GmbH company nor Applied Control Concepts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bachmann electronic GmbH company nor Applied Control Concepts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Applied Control Concepts company nor Bachmann electronic GmbH company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Applied Control Concepts nor Bachmann electronic GmbH holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Applied Control Concepts company nor Bachmann electronic GmbH company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bachmann electronic GmbH company employs more people globally than Applied Control Concepts company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Applied Control Concepts nor Bachmann electronic GmbH holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Applied Control Concepts nor Bachmann electronic GmbH holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Applied Control Concepts nor Bachmann electronic GmbH holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Applied Control Concepts nor Bachmann electronic GmbH holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Applied Control Concepts nor Bachmann electronic GmbH holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Applied Control Concepts nor Bachmann electronic GmbH holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H