Comparison Overview

Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC

VS

Lancashire Mind

Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC

909 North Miami Beach Blvd., North Miami Beach, Florida, 33162, US
Last Update: 2026-01-15

ABS provides exceptional Mental Health, Consultative and Behavior Analysis Services to the community at large. For over 15 years, we have remained the premier choice for you or your loved one and strive each day to ensure this never changes. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. ABS also has a wealth of resources and current information on our website which can be found at www.appliedbehavior.net The administrative and office staff are very compassionate and well-trained in their specialties and are always committed to help.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lancashire Mind

80-82 Devonshire Road, Chorley, PR7 2DR, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Lancashire Mind was officially formed in 2010 after the joining of three local Minds: Chorley and South Ribble, Blackburn with Darwen, and Blackpool, Fylde and North Lancashire. Since then, we haven’t stopped progressing. In 2014 we launched the Blueprint for Lancashire, marking the start of the wellbeing revolution. Two years later we’re making good progress. We’ve successfully put the prevention of mental health conditions on the agenda, with local Councils and Clinical Commissioning Groups. In addition to our support services, we’ve rolled out a range of wellbeing and prevention initiatives, working across schools, workplaces and communities in Lancashire. We are more than a mental health charity. We’re a passionate movement leading the mental wellbeing revolution in Lancashire. We campaign to make mental wellbeing a local priority. We help you find the tools you need to stay on track, and when needed, get back on track. We work in schools and businesses across Lancashire to shape a generation that won’t treat people differently based on their mental health. And we don’t stop there. It’s big, bold and ambitious. A whole population approach that works for people at every level of mental health. Together, we can achieve it. Let’s make Lancashire the beacon county for mental wellbeing.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-behavior-solutions-llc.jpeg
Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lancashire-mind.jpeg
Lancashire Mind
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lancashire Mind
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lancashire Mind in 2026.

Incident History — Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lancashire Mind (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lancashire Mind cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-behavior-solutions-llc.jpeg
Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lancashire-mind.jpeg
Lancashire Mind
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lancashire Mind company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lancashire Mind company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC company.

In the current year, Lancashire Mind company and Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lancashire Mind company nor Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lancashire Mind company nor Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lancashire Mind company nor Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC company nor Lancashire Mind company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC nor Lancashire Mind holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC company nor Lancashire Mind company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lancashire Mind company employs more people globally than Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC nor Lancashire Mind holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC nor Lancashire Mind holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC nor Lancashire Mind holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC nor Lancashire Mind holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC nor Lancashire Mind holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Applied Behavior Solutions, LLC nor Lancashire Mind holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N