Comparison Overview

Apple Inc 2153439011

VS

Telecom Argentina

Apple Inc 2153439011

Weteringschans 67, None, Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NL, 1017RX
Last Update: 2025-12-22
Between 700 and 749

Apple Inc Software Technology Industries.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Telecom Argentina

Calle General Hornos 690, Comuna 1, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, AR, 1272
Last Update: 2025-12-25

We are Telecom Argentina, a connectivity solutions and entertainment company with over 23,000 collaborators throughout the country. We transform the digital experience of our over 28 million customers providing them a secure, flexible and dynamic service on all of their devices, with high speed mobile and fixed connections, and a live and on-demand contents platform which includes series, films, gaming, music and TV shows. Through our commercial brands Personal, Fibertel, Flow and Telecom | Fibercorp, we provide services such as fixed and mobile telephony, data transmission, pay TV and Internet, for individuals, companies and institutions throughout the country. We are also present in Paraguay, providing mobile service, and in Uruguay, with pay TV. We are leaders in an industry that has become one of the pillars for the social and economic development of our country, and we are active participants in the community with sustainable practices and initiatives that add value to the use of technology as a tool for training and social inclusion.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 14,254
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/appleinc.jpeg
Apple Inc 2153439011
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telecom-argentina.jpeg
Telecom Argentina
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Apple Inc 2153439011
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Telecom Argentina
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

Apple Inc 2153439011 has 25.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telecom Argentina in 2025.

Incident History — Apple Inc 2153439011 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Apple Inc 2153439011 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Telecom Argentina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telecom Argentina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/appleinc.jpeg
Apple Inc 2153439011
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial gain through resale of stolen devices
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telecom-argentina.jpeg
Telecom Argentina
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/1990
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Telecom Argentina company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Apple Inc 2153439011 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Apple Inc 2153439011 and Telecom Argentina have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Apple Inc 2153439011 company has reported more cyber incidents than Telecom Argentina company.

Telecom Argentina company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Apple Inc 2153439011 company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Telecom Argentina company nor Apple Inc 2153439011 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Apple Inc 2153439011 company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Telecom Argentina company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 company nor Telecom Argentina company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Telecom Argentina holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Telecom Argentina company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Apple Inc 2153439011 company.

Telecom Argentina company employs more people globally than Apple Inc 2153439011 company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Telecom Argentina holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Telecom Argentina holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Telecom Argentina holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Telecom Argentina holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Telecom Argentina holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Telecom Argentina holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N