Comparison Overview

Apple Inc 2153439011

VS

Reliance Communications

Apple Inc 2153439011

Weteringschans 67, None, Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NL, 1017RX
Last Update: 2025-12-22
Between 700 and 749

Apple Inc Software Technology Industries.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Reliance Communications

A Block, 2nd Floor, Reliance Communications Limited, DAKC, Kopar Khairane, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400710
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 700 and 749

Reliance Communications Limited, founded by the late Shri Dhirubhai H Ambani (1932-2002), has Corporate clientele that includes 40,000 Indian and multinational corporations, including small and medium enterprises. Reliance Communications has established a pan-India, Next-Generation, digital network that is capable of supporting best-of-class services spanning the entire communications value chain. Reliance Communications owns and operates the world's largest Next-Generation IP-enabled connectivity infrastructure, comprising fiber optic cable systems in India, the USA, Europe, Middle East and the Asia Pacific region.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 18,273
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/appleinc.jpeg
Apple Inc 2153439011
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliance-communications.jpeg
Reliance Communications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Apple Inc 2153439011
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Reliance Communications
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

Apple Inc 2153439011 has 25.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reliance Communications in 2025.

Incident History — Apple Inc 2153439011 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Apple Inc 2153439011 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Reliance Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reliance Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/appleinc.jpeg
Apple Inc 2153439011
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial gain through resale of stolen devices
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliance-communications.jpeg
Reliance Communications
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Reliance Communications company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Apple Inc 2153439011 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Apple Inc 2153439011 company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Reliance Communications company has not reported any.

In the current year, Apple Inc 2153439011 company has reported more cyber incidents than Reliance Communications company.

Neither Reliance Communications company nor Apple Inc 2153439011 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Reliance Communications company nor Apple Inc 2153439011 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Apple Inc 2153439011 company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Reliance Communications company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 company nor Reliance Communications company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Reliance Communications holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 company nor Reliance Communications company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Reliance Communications company employs more people globally than Apple Inc 2153439011 company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Reliance Communications holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Reliance Communications holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Reliance Communications holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Reliance Communications holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Reliance Communications holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Reliance Communications holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N