Comparison Overview

Apple Inc 2153439011

VS

Huawei

Apple Inc 2153439011

Weteringschans 67, None, Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NL, 1017RX
Last Update: 2025-12-22
Between 700 and 749

Apple Inc Software Technology Industries.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Huawei

Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Section H, Huawei Industrial Base, Bantian, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN, 518129
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 800 and 849

Huawei is a leading global provider of information and communications technology (ICT) infrastructure and smart devices. With integrated solutions across four key domains – telecom networks, IT, smart devices, and cloud services – we are committed to bringing digital to every person, home and organization for a fully connected, intelligent world. Huawei's end-to-end portfolio of products, solutions and services are both competitive and secure. Through open collaboration with ecosystem partners, we create lasting value for our customers, working to empower people, enrich home life, and inspire innovation in organizations of all shapes and sizes. At Huawei, innovation focuses on customer needs. We invest heavily in basic research, concentrating on technological breakthroughs that drive the world forward. We have more than 207,000 employees, and we operate in more than 170 countries and regions. Founded in 1987, Huawei is a private company fully owned by its employees. House Rules This page is for ICT professionals with an interest in Huawei and our industry to engage in open discussions. To facilitate dialogue, please follow these rules: - Huawei holds the right to delete comments that are offensive, misleading, false, unlawful, off-topic and in violation of any regulations. - Repeated violations of any of the above will be removed and users may be blocked. - Huawei does not necessarily endorse the information shared by members. - Please be familiar with and follow LinkedIn's User Agreement. - By publicly uploading a photograph or comment, you give Huawei permission to feature your content. This will always be credited. Please visit the below portals for career or customer service queries. Career page: http://bit.ly/2rdljD7 Customer service: http://bit.ly/2a4mXNY Thank you for visiting us & we hope you enjoy your time on our page.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 131,845
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/appleinc.jpeg
Apple Inc 2153439011
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/huawei.jpeg
Huawei
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Apple Inc 2153439011
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Huawei
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

Apple Inc 2153439011 has 25.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

Huawei has 25.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Apple Inc 2153439011 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Apple Inc 2153439011 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Huawei (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Huawei cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/appleinc.jpeg
Apple Inc 2153439011
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial gain through resale of stolen devices
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/huawei.jpeg
Huawei
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain (sale of source code), Reputation (underground forum credibility), Potential Espionage or Competitive Advantage
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Huawei company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Apple Inc 2153439011 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Apple Inc 2153439011 and Huawei have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Huawei and Apple Inc 2153439011 have reported a similar number of cyber incidents.

Neither Huawei company nor Apple Inc 2153439011 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Huawei company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Apple Inc 2153439011 company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Apple Inc 2153439011 company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Huawei company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 company nor Huawei company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Huawei holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Huawei company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Apple Inc 2153439011 company.

Huawei company employs more people globally than Apple Inc 2153439011 company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Huawei holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Huawei holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Huawei holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Huawei holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Huawei holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Apple Inc 2153439011 nor Huawei holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N