Comparison Overview

iOutlet

VS

Silicon Mechanics

iOutlet

1236 West Wooster, Bowling Green, Ohio, 43402, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

iOutlet, formerly Apple Outlet, was founded out of our Founder’s bedroom in 2013. Michael founded iOutlet on the simple belief that customers need a trustworthy place to buy pre-owned Apple products and take their electronics for repair. We don't like to see people being confused or taken advantage of by impersonal electronics stores. Here, everyone we come into contact with is treated like family. Over the years, we've developed a four-fold strategy for continuing the excellent experience our customers have come to expect. iOutlet specializes in off-lease pre-owned Apple devices, and Apple/Electronic repair. What this means is that after Apple devices have been leased to a place like a school district, business, or government agency we go in and buy the devices.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Silicon Mechanics

22029 23rd DR SE, Bothell, WA, 98021, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Silicon Mechanics is one of the world’s largest private providers of high-performance computing, artificial intelligence, and enterprise storage systems. Since 2001, clients across sectors including aerospace and defense, education/research, financial services, government, and life sciences/healthcare, among others, have relied on us to help them overcome the world’s most complex computing challenges. Silicon Mechanics solutions always come with our “Expert Included” SM.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apple-outlet.jpeg
iOutlet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/silicon-mechanics.jpeg
Silicon Mechanics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
iOutlet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Silicon Mechanics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for iOutlet in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Silicon Mechanics in 2025.

Incident History — iOutlet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

iOutlet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Silicon Mechanics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Silicon Mechanics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apple-outlet.jpeg
iOutlet
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/silicon-mechanics.jpeg
Silicon Mechanics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both iOutlet company and Silicon Mechanics company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Silicon Mechanics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to iOutlet company.

In the current year, Silicon Mechanics company and iOutlet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Silicon Mechanics company nor iOutlet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Silicon Mechanics company nor iOutlet company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Silicon Mechanics company nor iOutlet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither iOutlet company nor Silicon Mechanics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither iOutlet nor Silicon Mechanics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither iOutlet company nor Silicon Mechanics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Silicon Mechanics company employs more people globally than iOutlet company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither iOutlet nor Silicon Mechanics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither iOutlet nor Silicon Mechanics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither iOutlet nor Silicon Mechanics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither iOutlet nor Silicon Mechanics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither iOutlet nor Silicon Mechanics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither iOutlet nor Silicon Mechanics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H