Comparison Overview

Appingo

VS

Natur & Kultur

Appingo

333 Moody St., Waltham, MA, 02453, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Appingo believes that the process of publishing can and should be better. The art of producing a book–no matter the type, subject, or format–has been buried under the pressures, stresses, and distractions of an ever-complicated and disorganized production process. Today’s typical, inefficient production process creates unpredictable and extended production schedules, budget overruns, communication problems, and file management issues–with no good way to report any of it! But hope is not lost. Appingo’s Production Management software suite is quickly becoming the industry’s premier production management solution. Appingo solves the problems that haunt Production Managers around the world because it was designed by real production managers, in an active production environment. At the same time it gives Executives real-time data about their titles From lower production overhead to tighter production schedules, the Appingo Production Management software suite… Because books don’t make themselves.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Natur & Kultur

Karlavägen 31, Stockholm, 114 31, SE
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Varje gång du väljer förlaget Natur & Kultur är du med och bidrar till något större. Vi är en oberoende stiftelse som ska göra skillnad i samhället. Förutom att inspirera till läsande och lärande stärker vi röster i det demokratiska samtalet genom priser, stipendier och stöd. Vi ger ordet till fler.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 243
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/appingo.jpeg
Appingo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natur-&-kultur.jpeg
Natur & Kultur
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Appingo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Natur & Kultur
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Appingo in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Natur & Kultur in 2025.

Incident History — Appingo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Appingo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Natur & Kultur (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Natur & Kultur cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/appingo.jpeg
Appingo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natur-&-kultur.jpeg
Natur & Kultur
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Natur & Kultur company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Appingo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Natur & Kultur company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Appingo company.

In the current year, Natur & Kultur company and Appingo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Natur & Kultur company nor Appingo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Natur & Kultur company nor Appingo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Natur & Kultur company nor Appingo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Appingo company nor Natur & Kultur company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Appingo nor Natur & Kultur holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Appingo company nor Natur & Kultur company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Natur & Kultur company employs more people globally than Appingo company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Appingo nor Natur & Kultur holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Appingo nor Natur & Kultur holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Appingo nor Natur & Kultur holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Appingo nor Natur & Kultur holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Appingo nor Natur & Kultur holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Appingo nor Natur & Kultur holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.