Comparison Overview

Appingo

VS

Florida Sportsman

Appingo

333 Moody St., Waltham, MA, 02453, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Appingo believes that the process of publishing can and should be better. The art of producing a book–no matter the type, subject, or format–has been buried under the pressures, stresses, and distractions of an ever-complicated and disorganized production process. Today’s typical, inefficient production process creates unpredictable and extended production schedules, budget overruns, communication problems, and file management issues–with no good way to report any of it! But hope is not lost. Appingo’s Production Management software suite is quickly becoming the industry’s premier production management solution. Appingo solves the problems that haunt Production Managers around the world because it was designed by real production managers, in an active production environment. At the same time it gives Executives real-time data about their titles From lower production overhead to tighter production schedules, the Appingo Production Management software suite… Because books don’t make themselves.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Florida Sportsman

34994, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

The country's largest state-based outdoors magazine, Florida Sportsman covers hunting and fishing in Florida and the tropics. With more than 100,000 monthly subscribers and news-stand sales of greater than 20,000, Florida Sportsman is considered a standard bearer of outdoor journalism, with a long and storied history of fighting for marine conservation and recreational anglers' rights.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/appingo.jpeg
Appingo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Florida Sportsman
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Appingo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Florida Sportsman
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Appingo in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida Sportsman in 2025.

Incident History — Appingo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Appingo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Florida Sportsman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida Sportsman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/appingo.jpeg
Appingo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Florida Sportsman
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Florida Sportsman company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Appingo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Florida Sportsman company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Appingo company.

In the current year, Florida Sportsman company and Appingo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Florida Sportsman company nor Appingo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Florida Sportsman company nor Appingo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Florida Sportsman company nor Appingo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Appingo company nor Florida Sportsman company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Appingo nor Florida Sportsman holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Appingo company nor Florida Sportsman company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Florida Sportsman company employs more people globally than Appingo company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Appingo nor Florida Sportsman holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Appingo nor Florida Sportsman holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Appingo nor Florida Sportsman holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Appingo nor Florida Sportsman holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Appingo nor Florida Sportsman holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Appingo nor Florida Sportsman holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.