Comparison Overview

APOSTROPHE REPS

VS

Chic Critique Forum

APOSTROPHE REPS

217 Centre Street, New York, NY, 10013, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.apostrophereps.com

Apostrophe is a New York-based artist representative agency, with an office in Los Angeles and dedicated agents throughout the US. We connect top-tier artists with advertisers, corporations, brands, and other media outlets worldwide, creating compelling work across multiple platforms and disciplines. Our roster embraces innovative talent working in photography, motion and styling. Together, we are a team of conceptual thinkers and practical strategists. Our team is adept at translating our clients’ and artists’ needs and goals into exceptional work, bringing each and every project to a successful outcome, all the while meeting and exceeding client expectations. Progressive in our thinking, we’re creative and industry trend-watchers, always seeking opportunities to elevate our talent, and our clients. We bring insight and integrity to all that we do, guiding our clients and artists in the evolving global marketplace. We believe it’s our role to be trusted partners to our artists and clients throughout the lifespan of every project. We look forward to working with you soon. APOSTROPHE 217 Centre Street, FL7 New York NY 10013 EAST COAST - 212 279 2252 MIDWEST - 312 735 8835 WEST COAST - 310 341 3132

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Chic Critique Forum

None
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://chiccritiqueforum.com/

Transform your images from weak to Chic! Are you frustrated with fake feedback on your photos like: "Awww, it's cute" or "Great shot!"?? Do you wish you could get genuine responses? The Chic Critique Forum is focused on providing candid critique for photographers. Whether you are an amateur or a seasoned photographer, Chic Critique Forum is the place to be when you are ready to step it up. Our forum members are strongly encouraged to offer at least one suggestion to every image they choose to comment on. Also, members can sign up for our exclusive "4-Week Critiques" with any of our Celebrity Photographers. All members get FREE What-to-Wear guides every month too! Join a creative community of aspiring and inspiring photographers who share honest critique.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apostrophe-reps.jpeg
APOSTROPHE REPS
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chic-critique-forum.jpeg
Chic Critique Forum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
APOSTROPHE REPS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chic Critique Forum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for APOSTROPHE REPS in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chic Critique Forum in 2025.

Incident History — APOSTROPHE REPS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

APOSTROPHE REPS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chic Critique Forum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chic Critique Forum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apostrophe-reps.jpeg
APOSTROPHE REPS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chic-critique-forum.jpeg
Chic Critique Forum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Chic Critique Forum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to APOSTROPHE REPS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Chic Critique Forum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to APOSTROPHE REPS company.

In the current year, Chic Critique Forum company and APOSTROPHE REPS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chic Critique Forum company nor APOSTROPHE REPS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chic Critique Forum company nor APOSTROPHE REPS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chic Critique Forum company nor APOSTROPHE REPS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither APOSTROPHE REPS company nor Chic Critique Forum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither APOSTROPHE REPS nor Chic Critique Forum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither APOSTROPHE REPS company nor Chic Critique Forum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

APOSTROPHE REPS company employs more people globally than Chic Critique Forum company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither APOSTROPHE REPS nor Chic Critique Forum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither APOSTROPHE REPS nor Chic Critique Forum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither APOSTROPHE REPS nor Chic Critique Forum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither APOSTROPHE REPS nor Chic Critique Forum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither APOSTROPHE REPS nor Chic Critique Forum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither APOSTROPHE REPS nor Chic Critique Forum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References