Comparison Overview

Apollo Education Group

VS

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Apollo Education Group

4025 S. Riverpoint Pkwy, Phoenix, AZ, US, 85040
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 650 and 699

Apollo Education Group, Inc. was founded in 1973 in response to a gradual shift in higher education demographics from a student population dominated by youth to one in which approximately half the students are adults and over 80 percent of whom work full-time. Apollo's founder, John Sperling, believed -- and events proved him right -- that lifelong employment with a single employer would be replaced by lifelong learning and employment with a variety of employers. Lifelong learning requires an institution dedicated solely to the education of working adults. Today, Apollo Education Group, Inc., through its subsidiaries, the University of Phoenix, the College for Financial Planning, and Western International University, has established itself as a leading provider of higher education programs for working adults by focusing on servicing the needs of the working adult. Apollo Education Group is an Equal Opportunity Employer and welcomes diversity.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 10,273
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Administration Bldg Suite 1070, BIRMINGHAM, AL, US, 35294-0110
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Known for its innovative and interdisciplinary approach to education at both the graduate and undergraduate levels, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, a part of the University of Alabama System, is an internationally renowned research university and academic medical center with over $700 million in research awards annually, as well as Alabama’s largest single employer, with some 26,000 employees, and has an annual economic impact exceeding $7.15 billion on the state. The pillars of UAB’s mission include education, research, innovation and economic development, community engagement, and patient care. Learn more at www.uab.edu.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 16,187
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apollo-group.jpeg
Apollo Education Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uab.jpeg
University of Alabama at Birmingham
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Apollo Education Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Alabama at Birmingham
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Apollo Education Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Alabama at Birmingham in 2026.

Incident History — Apollo Education Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Apollo Education Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Alabama at Birmingham (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Alabama at Birmingham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apollo-group.jpeg
Apollo Education Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite
Motivation: Data theft and extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exploitation of zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-61882)
Motivation: Extortion, Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uab.jpeg
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

University of Alabama at Birmingham company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Apollo Education Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Apollo Education Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Alabama at Birmingham company has not reported any.

In the current year, University of Alabama at Birmingham company and Apollo Education Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Alabama at Birmingham company nor Apollo Education Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Apollo Education Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other University of Alabama at Birmingham company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Apollo Education Group company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while University of Alabama at Birmingham company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Apollo Education Group company nor University of Alabama at Birmingham company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Apollo Education Group nor University of Alabama at Birmingham holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Alabama at Birmingham company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Apollo Education Group company.

University of Alabama at Birmingham company employs more people globally than Apollo Education Group company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Apollo Education Group nor University of Alabama at Birmingham holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Apollo Education Group nor University of Alabama at Birmingham holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Apollo Education Group nor University of Alabama at Birmingham holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Apollo Education Group nor University of Alabama at Birmingham holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Apollo Education Group nor University of Alabama at Birmingham holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Apollo Education Group nor University of Alabama at Birmingham holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H