Comparison Overview

Apollo Global Management, Inc.

VS

Sicredi

Apollo Global Management, Inc.

9 West 57th Street, New York, New York, 10019, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

Apollo is a high-growth, global alternative asset manager. In our asset management business, we seek to provide our clients excess return at every point along the risk-reward spectrum from investment grade credit to private equity. For more than three decades, our investing expertise across our fully integrated platform has served the financial return needs of our clients and provided businesses with innovative capital solutions for growth. Through Athene, our retirement services business, we specialize in helping clients achieve financial security by providing a suite of retirement savings products and acting as a solutions provider to institutions. Our patient, creative, and knowledgeable approach to investing aligns our clients, businesses we invest in, our employees, and the communities we impact, to expand opportunity and achieve positive outcomes. To learn more, please visit www.apollo.com. Nothing herein constitutes an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any security or product of Apollo or any Apollo-managed fund.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 4,473
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sicredi

Av. Assis Brasil, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 91010-003, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

We are born collaborative We believe that change is only possible when everyone works together for the same purpose, after all, cooperativism is in our DNA. Besides this, we know that as important as it is to provide affordable financial solutions it is just as important to value growing together, quality of life and the social and economic development of everyone who makes this happen. Therefore, we are committed to our employees, our associates and the regions in which we operate. Together we make a difference We were fortunate to be recognized as one of the best companies in Brazil to work for. This recognition is a reflection of all the collective effort put into creating and maintaining a safe and welcoming work environment. Here numbers are not the most important thing, what really matters is that we are made up of people for people. We have opportunities for professionals from different areas and we recognize that working together makes a difference in our lives. Be part of this history, be Sicredi!

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 19,425
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apollo-global-management-inc.jpeg
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sicredi.jpeg
Sicredi
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sicredi
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Apollo Global Management, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sicredi in 2025.

Incident History — Apollo Global Management, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Apollo Global Management, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sicredi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sicredi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apollo-global-management-inc.jpeg
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sicredi.jpeg
Sicredi
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Apollo Global Management, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sicredi company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sicredi company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Apollo Global Management, Inc. company.

In the current year, Sicredi company and Apollo Global Management, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sicredi company nor Apollo Global Management, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sicredi company nor Apollo Global Management, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sicredi company nor Apollo Global Management, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Apollo Global Management, Inc. company nor Sicredi company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Apollo Global Management, Inc. nor Sicredi holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Apollo Global Management, Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sicredi company.

Sicredi company employs more people globally than Apollo Global Management, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Apollo Global Management, Inc. nor Sicredi holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Apollo Global Management, Inc. nor Sicredi holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Apollo Global Management, Inc. nor Sicredi holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Apollo Global Management, Inc. nor Sicredi holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Apollo Global Management, Inc. nor Sicredi holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Apollo Global Management, Inc. nor Sicredi holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H