Comparison Overview

APEX

VS

1st Jackpot Casino Tunica

APEX

Czech Republic, Austria, CZ
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

APEX by name APEX by nature! APEX provides complete gaming solutions, such as slot machines, jackpot islands, table games, iDrop devices, card shufflers, and other casino equipment. CLOVER LINK and the EVO platform truly take gaming to the next level – come and ‘see the difference’. With extensive sales in several countries, APEX has its finger on the pulse to provide market-beating solutions. APEX by name – APEX by nature: The word APEX refers to the ‘summit’ or the ‘highest point of a pyramid’. Just like reaching the summit of a mountain, the ethos at APEX is to reach the pinnacle of gaming – being one step ahead of the market by offering the very latest technology with the benefits for both players and operators in mind. The company logo of the pyramid underlines this strategy – the top of the pyramid is gold – which is – of course – the apex.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 977
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

1st Jackpot Casino Tunica

1450 Jackpot Blvd, Robinsonville, 38664, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Your Closest Bet for Fun! 1st Jackpot Casino features the newest slots with hundreds of new ways to win with the most popular games. We also feature all of your favorite table games and a Tunica exclusive with Wild Hold 'Em Stud. 1st Jackpot Casino has a generous comp policy for all players who use their Marquee Rewards card – just ask one of our friendly casino cashiers for more details

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apex-gaming-t.jpeg
APEX
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/1st-jackpot-casino-tunica.jpeg
1st Jackpot Casino Tunica
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
APEX
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
1st Jackpot Casino Tunica
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for APEX in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica in 2025.

Incident History — APEX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

APEX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

1st Jackpot Casino Tunica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apex-gaming-t.jpeg
APEX
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/1st-jackpot-casino-tunica.jpeg
1st Jackpot Casino Tunica
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

APEX company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to APEX company.

In the current year, 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company and APEX company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company nor APEX company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company nor APEX company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company nor APEX company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither APEX company nor 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither APEX nor 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to APEX company.

APEX company employs more people globally than 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither APEX nor 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither APEX nor 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither APEX nor 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither APEX nor 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither APEX nor 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica holds HIPAA certification.

Neither APEX nor 1st Jackpot Casino Tunica holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H