Comparison Overview

Administrația Națională „Apele Române”

VS

US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Administrația Națională „Apele Române”

Strada Edgar Quinet, Sector 1, 010018, RO
Last Update: 2025-12-24
Between 600 and 649

None

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Washington, DC, US, 20004
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) mission is to protect human health and the environment. EPA works to ensure that: - Americans have clean air, land and water; - National efforts to reduce environmental risks are based on the best available scientific information; - Federal laws protecting human health and the environment are administered and enforced fairly, effectively and as Congress intended; - Environmental stewardship is integral to U.S. policies concerning natural resources, human health, economic growth, energy, transportation, agriculture, industry, and international trade, and these factors are similarly considered in establishing environmental policy; - All parts of society--communities, individuals, businesses, and state, local and tribal governments--have access to accurate information sufficient to effectively participate in managing human health and environmental risks; - Contaminated lands and toxic sites are cleaned up by potentially responsible parties and revitalized; and - Chemicals in the marketplace are reviewed for safety. The agency was founded in 1970 and is headquartered in Washington, District of Columbia with ten additional regional headquarters offices (Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Kansas City, Denver, San Francisco, and Seattle) as well as more than a dozen laboratories, and other regional and programmatic offices.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 16,703
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apele-romane.jpeg
Administrația Națională „Apele Române”
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-epa.jpeg
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Administrația Națională „Apele Române”
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

Administrația Națională „Apele Române” has 19.05% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2025.

Incident History — Administrația Națională „Apele Române” (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Administrația Națională „Apele Române” cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apele-romane.jpeg
Administrația Națională „Apele Române”
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-epa.jpeg
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) company has not reported any.

In the current year, Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company has reported more cyber incidents than US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) company.

Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) company nor Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) company nor Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company nor US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Administrația Națională „Apele Române” nor US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company.

US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) company employs more people globally than Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Administrația Națională „Apele Române” nor US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Administrația Națională „Apele Române” nor US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Administrația Națională „Apele Române” nor US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Administrația Națională „Apele Române” nor US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Administrația Națională „Apele Române” nor US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Administrația Națională „Apele Române” nor US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N