Comparison Overview

ANZ

VS

PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

ANZ

833 Collins Street, Docklands, Melbourne, 3008, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.anz.com

ANZ has a proud heritage of more than 180 years. Our purpose is to shape a world where people and communities thrive. That is why we strive to create a balanced, sustainable economy in which everyone can take part and build a better life. We employ more than 50,000 people and have our global headquarters in Melbourne. ANZ is among the top 4 banks in Australia, the largest banking group in New Zealand and Pacific, and among the top 50 banks in the world. Follow us elsewhere for our latest news: facebook.com/ANZAustralia facebook.com/ANZNewZealand twitter.com/ANZ_AU twitter.com/ANZ_NZ twitter.com/ANZ_Media twitter.com/ANZ_BlueNotes twitter.com/ANZ_Research instagram.com/anz_au bluenotes.anz.com

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 51,422
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

Jl. Gatot Subroto Kav. 36-38, Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, ID, 12190
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
https://www.bankmandiri.co.id/

Bank Mandiri was established on 2 October 1998, as part of the bank restructuring program of the Government of Indonesia. In July 1999, four state-owned banks - Bank Bumi Daya, Bank Dagang Negara, Bank Exim and Bapindo - were amalgamated into Bank Mandiri. The history of these four banks can be traced back to over 140 years, and together they had contributed to the beginning of the Indonesian banking sector. We are continuously seeking mutually beneficial business opportunities that create synergies, building alliances and strengthening our supporting businesses with and through our subsidiaries, notably Bank Syariah Mandiri in Islamic banking, PT. Bank Mandiri Taspen in banking, Mandiri Europe in international banking, AXA Mandiri Financial Services in insurance, Mandiri Sekuritas in investment banking, Mandiri Capital Indonesia in venture capital, Mandiri Tunas Finance in multi-finance, Mandiri Utama Finance in multi-finance, and Mandiri International Remittance in remittance. With various subsidiaries that support our businesses, we have further strengthened our position as a prominent financial holdings institution in Indonesia.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 42,391
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anz.jpeg
ANZ
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bankmandiri.jpeg
PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ANZ
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ANZ in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. in 2025.

Incident History — ANZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ANZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anz.jpeg
ANZ
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bankmandiri.jpeg
PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ANZ company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ANZ company.

In the current year, PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company and ANZ company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company nor ANZ company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company nor ANZ company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company nor ANZ company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ANZ company nor PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ANZ nor PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ANZ company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company.

ANZ company employs more people globally than PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither ANZ nor PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ANZ nor PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ANZ nor PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ANZ nor PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ANZ nor PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ANZ nor PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References