Comparison Overview

Anysphere

VS

Zoho

Anysphere

None
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

We're Anysphere, the team behind Cursor. Our mission is to automate coding. Our approach is to build the engineer of the future: a human-AI programmer that's an order of magnitude more effective than any one programmer. This hybrid engineer will have effortless control over their codebase and no low-entropy keystrokes. They will iterate at the speed of their judgment, even in the most complex systems. Using a combination of AI and human ingenuity, they will out-smart and out-engineer the best pure-AI system. We are a group of researchers and engineers. We build software and models to invent at the edge of what's useful and what's possible. Cursor has already improved the lives of millions of programmers.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 1,393
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Zoho

Zoho Corporation Pvt. Ltd, Estancia IT Park, Plot No. 140 & 151,, Chennai, 603202, IN
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 800 and 849

Zoho offers beautifully smart software to help you grow your business. With over 100 million users worldwide, Zoho's 55+ products aid your sales and marketing, support and collaboration, finance, and recruitment needs—letting you focus only on your business. Zoho respects user privacy and does not have an ad-revenue model in any part of its business, including its free products. Zoho Corporation is privately held and profitable, with its headquarters in Chennai, India, and offices across the globe.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 29,976
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anysphereinc.jpeg
Anysphere
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoho.jpeg
Zoho
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Anysphere
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zoho
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anysphere in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zoho in 2026.

Incident History — Anysphere (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anysphere cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zoho (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zoho cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anysphereinc.jpeg
Anysphere
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Malicious Repository (GitHub/other platforms), Auto-execution via `.vscode/tasks.json` (Workspace Trust disabled), Prompt Injection in AI Code Assistants (Claude Code, etc.), WebSocket Authentication Bypass (CVE-2025-52882), SQL Injection (Postgres MCP), Path Traversal (Microsoft NLWeb), Open Redirect/Stored XSS (Base44)
Motivation: Supply chain compromise, Credential theft, Data exfiltration, System persistence, AI model manipulation (prompt injection)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Compromised Software Dependency, Manipulated Configuration Files (MCP), Social Engineering (Trusted Repository Abuse)
Motivation: Espionage, Intellectual Property Theft, Persistent Access, Data Exfiltration
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Shared Repository (GitHub), Local File Modification, MCP Configuration Poisoning, Supply Chain Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoho.jpeg
Zoho
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Authentication Bypass
Motivation: Account Takeover, Access Sensitive Data
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Zoho company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Anysphere company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Anysphere company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Zoho company.

In the current year, Zoho company and Anysphere company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Zoho company nor Anysphere company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Zoho company nor Anysphere company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Zoho company nor Anysphere company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Both Anysphere company and Zoho company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither Anysphere nor Zoho holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Zoho company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Anysphere company.

Zoho company employs more people globally than Anysphere company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Anysphere nor Zoho holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Anysphere nor Zoho holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Anysphere nor Zoho holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Anysphere nor Zoho holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Anysphere nor Zoho holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Anysphere nor Zoho holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.